Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomas Bonnedahl <tomas@yes.nu>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] most out of qos
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 21:28:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-104448058423742@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-104445994220942@msgid-missing>

well, if tcp throttles down at the point where packets are dropped is of course good, but still, when a download is peaking at the maximum speed
minus a couple kbits, the delay is terrible, that's what i want to change. any idea?

regards,

tomas bonnedahl

On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:13:27PM +0100, Stef Coene wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 February 2003 16:44, Tomas Bonnedahl wrote:
> > to get most out of qos in general, would the best thing be to set up qos on
> > both ends of a bottleneck with both ingress and egress filtering? the
> > reason for asking is because we have a 2mbit connection with egress
> > filtering qos, the problem is that we experience most downloads compared to
> > uploades and therefor the egress filtering doesnt provide much help.
> >
> > what we could do is to get ingress filtering on our side here, but i dont
> > know how much that would help really, the data has already passed the
> > bottleneck in the path. so, my question, would i experience any different
> > delay if adding ingress filtering?
> Yes.  A tcp connection will throttle down  if you drop packets.  But this is 
> not the same as egress shaping.
> 
> > it is a 2mbit fiber stub network which looks pretty much like this:
> >
> > lan - router - fw - isp - internet
> >
> > the egress qos is at the moment at the router which pretty much says
> > "prioritize interactive sessions".
> >
> >
> > since the filtering for qos is rather simple, just telnet/ssh to a certain
> > host, should i contact my isp and ask them to set some egress qos going to
> > our network on the cisco router that is at their place? btw, anyone know
> > how good the qos is on cisco 2600?
> I have no idea how the qos works on cisco router.
> Just give it a try and se what happens.
> 
> Stef
> 
> -- 
> 
> stef.coene@docum.org
>  "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
>      http://www.docum.org/
>      #lartc @ irc.oftc.net
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-02-05 21:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-05 15:44 [LARTC] most out of qos Tomas Bonnedahl
2003-02-05 21:13 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-05 21:28 ` Tomas Bonnedahl [this message]
2003-02-06 10:04 ` Tomas Bonnedahl
2003-02-06 16:23 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-06 16:29 ` Tomas Bonnedahl
2003-02-06 16:47 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-06 16:49 ` Martin A. Brown
2003-02-06 16:58 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-06 17:01 ` Martin A. Brown
2003-02-06 17:11 ` Tomas Bonnedahl
2003-02-06 17:22 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-06 17:37 ` Tomas Bonnedahl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-104448058423742@msgid-missing \
    --to=tomas@yes.nu \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox