Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] most out of qos
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 16:23:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-104454867831381@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-104445994220942@msgid-missing>

On Wednesday 05 February 2003 22:28, Tomas Bonnedahl wrote:
> well, if tcp throttles down at the point where packets are dropped is of
> course good, but still, when a download is peaking at the maximum speed
> minus a couple kbits, the delay is terrible, that's what i want to change.
> any idea?
You can give the download 98% of the link so there is always 2% available for 
something else.  It also helps to throttle down _all_ incoming bandwidth to 
99% of your link so _you_ are shaping and not your router.  

Stef

>
> regards,
>
> tomas bonnedahl
>
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:13:27PM +0100, Stef Coene wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 February 2003 16:44, Tomas Bonnedahl wrote:
> > > to get most out of qos in general, would the best thing be to set up
> > > qos on both ends of a bottleneck with both ingress and egress
> > > filtering? the reason for asking is because we have a 2mbit connection
> > > with egress filtering qos, the problem is that we experience most
> > > downloads compared to uploades and therefor the egress filtering doesnt
> > > provide much help.
> > >
> > > what we could do is to get ingress filtering on our side here, but i
> > > dont know how much that would help really, the data has already passed
> > > the bottleneck in the path. so, my question, would i experience any
> > > different delay if adding ingress filtering?
> >
> > Yes.  A tcp connection will throttle down  if you drop packets.  But this
> > is not the same as egress shaping.
> >
> > > it is a 2mbit fiber stub network which looks pretty much like this:
> > >
> > > lan - router - fw - isp - internet
> > >
> > > the egress qos is at the moment at the router which pretty much says
> > > "prioritize interactive sessions".
> > >
> > >
> > > since the filtering for qos is rather simple, just telnet/ssh to a
> > > certain host, should i contact my isp and ask them to set some egress
> > > qos going to our network on the cisco router that is at their place?
> > > btw, anyone know how good the qos is on cisco 2600?
> >
> > I have no idea how the qos works on cisco router.
> > Just give it a try and se what happens.
> >
> > Stef
> >
> > --
> >
> > stef.coene@docum.org
> >  "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
> >      http://www.docum.org/
> >      #lartc @ irc.oftc.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

-- 

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-02-06 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-05 15:44 [LARTC] most out of qos Tomas Bonnedahl
2003-02-05 21:13 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-05 21:28 ` Tomas Bonnedahl
2003-02-06 10:04 ` Tomas Bonnedahl
2003-02-06 16:23 ` Stef Coene [this message]
2003-02-06 16:29 ` Tomas Bonnedahl
2003-02-06 16:47 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-06 16:49 ` Martin A. Brown
2003-02-06 16:58 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-06 17:01 ` Martin A. Brown
2003-02-06 17:11 ` Tomas Bonnedahl
2003-02-06 17:22 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-06 17:37 ` Tomas Bonnedahl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-104454867831381@msgid-missing \
    --to=stef.coene@docum.org \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox