* [LARTC] Layer 7 support for tcng ?
@ 2003-10-05 1:20 Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
2003-10-07 23:06 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira @ 2003-10-05 1:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Yep, thats right. Does it exist somewhere ? Will it ever ?
Currently i use tcng for my bandwidth shaping and i really didnt want to
change to bare tc scripts.
- --
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|PGP Public Key: http://sys49152.net/pubkey.asc |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/f3HHRslfH2ZQjFARArZFAKDmAOz0u0t2M+Rd8UIAah1FouwzLACdHnVW
zALy7xbns/KUZYk+87l8LwI=JIhc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] Layer 7 support for tcng ?
2003-10-05 1:20 [LARTC] Layer 7 support for tcng ? Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
@ 2003-10-07 23:06 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira @ 2003-10-07 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 07 October 2003 21:15, Matthew Strait wrote:
>
> The plan is to port l7-filter to Netfilter. Once this is done, Netfilter
> can put marks on the packets that the pre-existing fw filter can use.
> This approach requires no changes to tcng (or tc). However, it does
> complicate shaping, since two steps are needed rather than one (i.e.
> "mark HTTP as 6; limit 6 to 1mbps", rather than "limit HTTP to 1mbps").
> In the long term, I'd like to have full layer7 support in both QoS and
> Netfilter.
This would be perfect. It doesn't really complicate my setup since i already
use shorewall as firewall and that has support for marking packets already.
Is this anywhere near to being usable ? Will it be 2.6 only ?
- --
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|PGP Public Key: http://sys49152.net/pubkey.asc |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/g0bjRslfH2ZQjFARAkgzAKCOuq5likCa+mSomisEAmBHw6+xlQCeMcSU
UqsaFBqzpqWMw1v2/QWHi0Y=FWZT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-07 23:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-05 1:20 [LARTC] Layer 7 support for tcng ? Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
2003-10-07 23:06 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox