Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [LARTC] "onlink" option for ip route
@ 2001-03-21  8:23 RoMaN SoFt / LLFB!!
  2001-03-22  2:19 ` Mike Fedyk
  2001-03-23 10:02 ` AW: " CARSTEN.SCHILL
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: RoMaN SoFt / LLFB!! @ 2001-03-21  8:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc


 Hi.

 Would someone be so kind to explain "onlink" option to me? Upon
reading "ip command" ref.man. I still don't understand what this
option is intended for. A example where this option may be useful
would be appreciated.

 Regards.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    ** RoMaN SoFt / LLFB **  
       roman@madrid.com
   http://pagina.de/romansoft
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [LARTC] "onlink" option for ip route
  2001-03-21  8:23 [LARTC] "onlink" option for ip route RoMaN SoFt / LLFB!!
@ 2001-03-22  2:19 ` Mike Fedyk
  2001-03-23 10:02 ` AW: " CARSTEN.SCHILL
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mike Fedyk @ 2001-03-22  2:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc

On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 09:23:04AM +0100, RoMaN SoFt / LLFB!! wrote:
> 
>  Hi.
> 
>  Would someone be so kind to explain "onlink" option to me? Upon
> reading "ip command" ref.man. I still don't understand what this
> option is intended for. A example where this option may be useful
> would be appreciated.
That's right, the one sentence about it is terse.  Maybe someone can be
verbose? ;)

I'm not sure why you would want something to look like one link when it's
really not... hmm, maybe bonding(etherchannel)? 

Mike

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* AW: [LARTC] "onlink" option for ip route
  2001-03-21  8:23 [LARTC] "onlink" option for ip route RoMaN SoFt / LLFB!!
  2001-03-22  2:19 ` Mike Fedyk
@ 2001-03-23 10:02 ` CARSTEN.SCHILL
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: CARSTEN.SCHILL @ 2001-03-23 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc


Have a look to "Tunnels over IP in Linux-2.2" (ip-tunnels.ps, part of the
iproute package). They use 'onlink' to switch off the consistency check for
gateway reachability during tunnel setup.

Regards,
Carsten


> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: RoMaN SoFt / LLFB!! [mailto:roman@madrid.com]
> Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 21. März 2001 09:23
> An: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
> Betreff: [LARTC] "onlink" option for ip route
> 
> 
>  Hi.
> 
>  Would someone be so kind to explain "onlink" option to me? Upon
> reading "ip command" ref.man. I still don't understand what this
> option is intended for. A example where this option may be useful
> would be appreciated.
> 
>  Regards.
> 
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>     ** RoMaN SoFt / LLFB **  
>        roman@madrid.com
>    http://pagina.de/romansoft
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: 
> http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/
> 

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: AW: [LARTC] "onlink" option for ip route
@ 2001-03-24 11:43 RoMaN SoFt / LLFB!!
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: RoMaN SoFt / LLFB!! @ 2001-03-24 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc

On Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:02:52 +0100, you wrote:

>Have a look to "Tunnels over IP in Linux-2.2" (ip-tunnels.ps, part of the
>iproute package). They use 'onlink' to switch off the consistency check for
>gateway reachability during tunnel setup.

 Please, couldn't you summarize the meaning of "onlink" option? Is it
necessary or could I remove it in my multipath setting? See my former
posts; basically it's a default route with two nexthops for traffic
balancing between them:

 linux balancer --> gatewayY
(192.168.0.1)       (192.168.5.Y)

(where Y= 1, 2)

 Balancer as well as gateway's are all connected to the same switch.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    ** RoMaN SoFt / LLFB **  
       roman@madrid.com
   http://pagina.de/romansoft
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-03-24 11:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-03-21  8:23 [LARTC] "onlink" option for ip route RoMaN SoFt / LLFB!!
2001-03-22  2:19 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-03-23 10:02 ` AW: " CARSTEN.SCHILL
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-03-24 11:43 RoMaN SoFt / LLFB!!

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox