From: Gavin <redhat@ihug.co.nz>
To: Linux-8086 - ELKS <Linux-8086@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 286 xterm?
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 21:23:09 +1200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200209032123.09997.redhat@ihug.co.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D74EA83.7A96@havn.com>
Actually this brings us back to a gui for ELKS Since even the desqview option
is 386 onwards, and for this I would use a cut down linux, if there's enough
memory in the graphics card even a 386 is pretty acceptable x-term.
I wonder now as to the nano-x option. So for me, this has gone full circle,
and back to seeing what it would take to get a gui onto an AT class machine.
Thanks to all who contributed. Now can we get a solution ?????
On Wednesday 04 September 2002 4:59 am, Blaz Antonic wrote:
> This is getting slightly off-topic but anyway ...
>
>
> > As I have a ibmps1 here that wont boot into elks, an x-term alternative
> > would be worth looking into. ( I am presenting a demo on x-terms at the
> > local lug soon and a few "unique demos will be good" an elks telnet via
> > slip will be running too :-)
>
> PS1 = AT class machine. As people pointed out Desqview/X won't (well,
> shouldn't according to docs) run on sub-386 processors. Older version
> Gregg was referring to (namely Desqview) don't have X capabilities.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-03 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-25 18:54 286 xterm? Bardelli Luigi
2002-08-25 21:42 ` Stefan de Konink
2002-08-25 21:54 ` Riley Williams
2002-08-25 22:31 ` Stefan de Konink
2002-09-01 6:28 ` Dan Olson
2002-09-01 9:48 ` Luigi Bardelli
2002-09-01 19:10 ` Rob Helmer
2002-09-01 19:06 ` Stefan de Konink
2002-09-01 19:29 ` Paul Nasrat
2002-09-02 9:44 ` Feher Tamas
2002-09-02 23:31 ` Gavin
2002-09-03 2:23 ` Gregg C Levine
2002-09-03 9:11 ` Feher Tamas
2002-09-03 16:59 ` Blaz Antonic
2002-09-03 9:23 ` Gavin [this message]
2002-09-03 17:17 ` Chad Page
2002-09-05 19:45 ` Robert de Bath
2002-09-05 20:17 ` Francois Gurin
2002-09-05 20:18 ` Dan Olson
2002-09-06 4:23 ` Gregg C Levine
2002-09-10 5:44 ` Robert de Bath
2002-09-10 18:55 ` Dan Olson
2002-09-12 15:30 ` Jacek Lipkowski
2002-09-17 16:33 ` Seemanta Dutta
2002-09-17 16:33 ` newbie...please help Seemanta Dutta
2002-09-10 21:47 ` 286 xterm? kees
2002-09-05 21:02 ` Chad Page
2002-09-03 16:17 ` Bardelli Luigi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200209032123.09997.redhat@ihug.co.nz \
--to=redhat@ihug.co.nz \
--cc=Linux-8086@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox