Re: Compiling 0.13pre1

Re: Compiling 0.13pre1

[Tommy McCabe]

--- Tommy McCabe <rocketjet314@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> --- Javier Sedano <javier.sedano@agora-2000.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi there,
> > 
> > 	I don't know what's the error, but be aware that
> it
> > may not mean a file 
> > called "system", but the "filesystem" (the "system
> > of files"; maybe you 
> > did not said YES to minixfs when configuring the
> > kernel.
> > 
> > Reagrds,
> 
> I did select the Minix filesystem, and no others, in
> the configuration. Here's the error message:
> 
> 
> (cd ../.. ; ld86 -0 -i   \
>         arch/i86/boot/crt0.o arch/i86/boot/crt1.o \
>         init/main.o kernel/kernel.a fs/fs.a
> lib/lib.a
> net/net.a fs/minix/minixfs.a
> arch/i86/kernel/akernel.a
> arch/i86/lib/lib86.a arch/i86/mm/mm.a 
> arch/i86/drivers/char/chr_drv.a
> arch/i86/drivers/block/blk_drv.a \
>         -t -M -o arch/i86/boot/system > System.tmp ;
> \
>         sort -k4 System.tmp > System.map ; rm -f
> System.tmp )
> usage: ld86 [-03NMdimrstz[-]] [-llib_extension] [-o
> outfile] [-Ccrtfile]
>        [-Llibdir] [-Olibfile] [-Ttextaddr]
> [-Ddataaddr] [-Hheapsize] infile...
> tools/build boot/bootsect boot/setup boot/system >
> boot/Image
> Root device is (3, -128)
> Boot sector 512 bytes.
> Setup is 1596 bytes.
> Unable to open 'system'
> make[1]: *** [Image] Error 1
> 
> 
> > Tommy McCabe wrote:
> > > When I run make Image, after make config and
> make
> > dep,
> > > I get an error when it tries to make the boot
> > image
> > > that file 'system' is missing. What's wrong?
> > > 
> > > __________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus"
> > Sweepstakes
> > >
> http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
> > "unsubscribe linux-8086" in
> > > the body of a message to
> majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at 
> > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Javier Sedano Jarillo:
> javier.sedano@agora-2000.com
> >                        
> > (http://www.it.uc3m.es/~jsedano)
> > Network&Systems Engineer
> > Agora Systems, S.A.
> > C/Aravaca 12
> > E-28040 Madrid (Spain)
> > Tel.: +34 91 533 58 57
> > Fax.: +34 91 534 84 77
> > --------
> > Mammmyyy, where is the man page fot the candle?
> > 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
> > "unsubscribe linux-8086" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at 
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus"
> Sweepstakes
> http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
> 

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus

Re: Compiling 0.13pre1

[Per Ola Ingvarsson]

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Tommy McCabe wrote:

> > the configuration. Here's the error message:

> > usage: ld86 [-03NMdimrstz[-]] [-llib_extension] [-o

Which version of dev86 did you compile elks with? It seems like the 
0.16.14-version does not like the -t option if it isn't before all the 
options without hyphens.

Patch for compiling with 0.16.14

[Per Ola Ingvarsson]

I think this patch makes it possible to compile elks using dev86 0.16.14.

Is there anyone who can confirm that it works and commit it?

RCS file: /cvsroot/elks/elks/arch/i86/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -r1.29 Makefile
95c95
<               -t -M -o $(ARCH_DIR)/boot/system > System.tmp ; \
---
>               -M -o $(ARCH_DIR)/boot/system > System.tmp ; \
110c110
<               -t -M -o $(ARCH_DIR)/boot/system > System.tmp ; \
---
>               -M -o $(ARCH_DIR)/boot/system > System.tmp ; \

Re: Patch for compiling with 0.16.14

[Paul Nasrat]

On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 10:45:12PM +0100, Per Ola Ingvarsson wrote:
> 
> I think this patch makes it possible to compile elks using dev86 0.16.14.
> 
> Is there anyone who can confirm that it works and commit it?

Happy to test and ci, though would prefer unified diffs (diff -u).

Probably unable to look at untill tomorrow though.

Paul