From: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
To: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
zhanjie9@hisilicon.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com,
perry.yuan@amd.com, mario.limonciello@amd.com,
gautham.shenoy@amd.com, ray.huang@amd.com, rdunlap@infradead.org,
zhenglifeng1@huawei.com, lenb@kernel.org, robert.moore@intel.com,
rafael@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, treding@nvidia.com,
jonathanh@nvidia.com, vsethi@nvidia.com, ksitaraman@nvidia.com,
sanjayc@nvidia.com, nhartman@nvidia.com, bbasu@nvidia.com,
corbet@lwn.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] ACPI: CPPC: Add cppc_get_perf() API to read performance controls
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 15:53:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <011bebf3-ebd4-4245-88ce-5e826faae66f@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251105113844.4086250-3-sumitg@nvidia.com>
Hello Sumit,
Sorry for the late review.
I think it would be nice to split the patchset in 2 as handling the
auto_sel and
min/max_perf values in the cppc_cpufreq driver might lead to more
discussion.
I.e. the ACPI: CPPC: XXX patches should be straightforward to upstream.
This is just a personal opinion, feel free to ignore it.
On 11/5/25 12:38, Sumit Gupta wrote:
> Add cppc_get_perf() function to read values of performance control
> registers including desired_perf, min_perf, max_perf, and energy_perf.
>
> This provides a read interface to complement the existing cppc_set_perf()
> write interface for performance control registers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta<sumitg@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 5 +++
> 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> index ab4651205e8a..05672c30187c 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> @@ -1731,6 +1731,79 @@ int cppc_set_enable(int cpu, bool enable)
> return cppc_set_reg_val(cpu, ENABLE, enable);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cppc_set_enable);
> +/**
> + * cppc_get_perf - Get a CPU's performance controls.
> + * @cpu: CPU for which to get performance controls.
> + * @perf_ctrls: ptr to cppc_perf_ctrls. See cppc_acpi.h
> + *
> + * Return: 0 for success with perf_ctrls, -ERRNO otherwise.
> + */
> +int cppc_get_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls)
> +{
> + struct cpc_desc *cpc_desc = per_cpu(cpc_desc_ptr, cpu);
> + struct cpc_register_resource *desired_perf_reg, *min_perf_reg, *max_perf_reg,
> + *energy_perf_reg;
> + u64 desired_perf = 0, min = 0, max = 0, energy_perf = 0;
> + int pcc_ss_id = per_cpu(cpu_pcc_subspace_idx, cpu);
> + struct cppc_pcc_data *pcc_ss_data = NULL;
> + int ret = 0, regs_in_pcc = 0;
> +
> + if (!cpc_desc) {
> + pr_debug("No CPC descriptor for CPU:%d\n", cpu);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + if (!perf_ctrls) {
> + pr_debug("Invalid perf_ctrls pointer\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + desired_perf_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[DESIRED_PERF];
> + min_perf_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[MIN_PERF];
> + max_perf_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[MAX_PERF];
> + energy_perf_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[ENERGY_PERF];
> +
> + /* Are any of the regs PCC ?*/
> + if (CPC_IN_PCC(desired_perf_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(min_perf_reg) ||
> + CPC_IN_PCC(max_perf_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(energy_perf_reg)) {
> + if (pcc_ss_id < 0) {
> + pr_debug("Invalid pcc_ss_id forCPU:%d\n", cpu);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> + pcc_ss_data = pcc_data[pcc_ss_id];
> + regs_in_pcc = 1;
> + down_write(&pcc_ss_data->pcc_lock);
> + /* Ring doorbell once to update PCC subspace */
> + if (send_pcc_cmd(pcc_ss_id, CMD_READ) < 0) {
> + pr_debug("Failed to send PCC command for CPU:%d, ret:%d\n", cpu, ret);
> + ret = -EIO;
> + goto out_err;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* Read optional elements if present */
> + if (CPC_SUPPORTED(max_perf_reg))
> + cpc_read(cpu, max_perf_reg, &max);
> + perf_ctrls->max_perf = max;
> +
> + if (CPC_SUPPORTED(min_perf_reg))
> + cpc_read(cpu, min_perf_reg, &min);
> + perf_ctrls->min_perf = min;
> +
NIT: I think the 'desired_perf_reg' register is mandatory, so the check
could be removed.
> + if (CPC_SUPPORTED(desired_perf_reg))
> + cpc_read(cpu, desired_perf_reg, &desired_perf);
> + perf_ctrls->desired_perf = desired_perf;
> +
> + if (CPC_SUPPORTED(energy_perf_reg))
> + cpc_read(cpu, energy_perf_reg, &energy_perf);
> + perf_ctrls->energy_perf = energy_perf;
> +
> +out_err:
> + if (regs_in_pcc)
> + up_write(&pcc_ss_data->pcc_lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cppc_get_perf);
>
> /**
> * cppc_set_perf - Set a CPU's performance controls.
> diff --git a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
> index 13fa81504844..7190afeead8b 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
> @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ extern int cppc_get_desired_perf(int cpunum, u64 *desired_perf);
> extern int cppc_get_nominal_perf(int cpunum, u64 *nominal_perf);
> extern int cppc_get_highest_perf(int cpunum, u64 *highest_perf);
> extern int cppc_get_perf_ctrs(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs *perf_fb_ctrs);
> +extern int cppc_get_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls);
> extern int cppc_set_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls);
> extern int cppc_set_enable(int cpu, bool enable);
> extern int cppc_get_perf_caps(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_caps *caps);
> @@ -192,6 +193,10 @@ static inline int cppc_get_perf_ctrs(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs *perf_fb_
> {
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
> +static inline int cppc_get_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls)
> +{
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> static inline int cppc_set_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls)
> {
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-27 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-05 11:38 [PATCH v4 0/8] Enhanced autonomous selection and improvements Sumit Gupta
2025-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] cpufreq: CPPC: Add generic helpers for sysfs show/store Sumit Gupta
2025-11-10 10:56 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-11-11 11:20 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] ACPI: CPPC: Add cppc_get_perf() API to read performance controls Sumit Gupta
2025-11-27 14:53 ` Pierre Gondois [this message]
2025-11-28 14:01 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-11-28 15:05 ` Pierre Gondois
2025-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] ACPI: CPPC: extend APIs to support auto_sel and epp Sumit Gupta
2025-11-12 15:02 ` Ionela Voinescu
2025-11-18 9:17 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-11-27 14:54 ` Pierre Gondois
2025-12-09 18:10 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] ACPI: CPPC: add APIs and sysfs interface for min/max_perf Sumit Gupta
2025-11-06 10:30 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-07 10:00 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-11-07 20:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-11 11:06 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-11-13 10:56 ` Ionela Voinescu
2025-11-18 9:34 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-11-27 14:54 ` Pierre Gondois
2025-12-09 16:38 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] ACPI: CPPC: add APIs and sysfs interface for perf_limited register Sumit Gupta
2025-11-13 11:35 ` Ionela Voinescu
2025-11-18 10:20 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-11-27 14:54 ` Pierre Gondois
2025-12-09 17:22 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] cpufreq: CPPC: Add sysfs for min/max_perf and perf_limited Sumit Gupta
2025-11-13 12:41 ` Ionela Voinescu
2025-11-18 10:46 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] cpufreq: CPPC: update policy min/max when toggling auto_select Sumit Gupta
2025-11-27 14:53 ` Pierre Gondois
2025-11-28 14:08 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] cpufreq: CPPC: add autonomous mode boot parameter support Sumit Gupta
2025-11-13 15:15 ` Ionela Voinescu
2025-11-26 13:32 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-11-27 14:53 ` Pierre Gondois
2025-11-28 14:29 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-11-28 15:05 ` Pierre Gondois
2025-12-01 14:09 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-11-10 11:00 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] Enhanced autonomous selection and improvements Viresh Kumar
2025-11-18 8:45 ` Jie Zhan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=011bebf3-ebd4-4245-88ce-5e826faae66f@arm.com \
--to=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=bbasu@nvidia.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=ksitaraman@nvidia.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=nhartman@nvidia.com \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=sanjayc@nvidia.com \
--cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox