Re: [PATCH 0/5] ACPI: acpi_bind_one()/acpi_unbind_one() cleanups

[Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>]

On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 00:29 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 06, 2013 03:15:36 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 02:22 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > > 
> > > The following 5 patches clean up a little mess in acpi_bind_one() and
> > > acpi_unbind_one().  They are on top of current linux-next plus the patch
> > > at https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2839101/ .
> > > 
> > > [1/5] Move duplicated code from acpi_bind_one()/acpi_unbind_one() to a separate
> > >       function.
> > 
> > I think the name of acpi_bind_physnode_name() is a bit confusing as if
> > it would make some persistent binding.  So, I'd suggest to rename it to
> > acpi_set_physnode_name().
> 
> In fact, the plan was to make it mean "physical node name for acpi_bind", but
> the execution was somewhat sloppy. ;-)
> 
> I think I'll call it acpi_physnode_link_name(), that should be clear enough.

Sounds good to me.

Thanks,
-Toshi