public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Acpi deadlocks with 3.7.0-rc4
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:09:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1658287.3KNDf2oyAg@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50B724F9.7040504@redhat.com>

On Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:03:53 AM Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> Dne 28.11.2012 21:31, Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> > On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 06:27:50 PM Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> >> Dne 28.11.2012 18:02, Linus Torvalds napsal(a):
> >>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I've opened  https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51071
> >>>> and attached picture there which is all I have.
> >
> > I wonder if you can try to apply the patch below and see if that makes any
> > difference?
> >
> 
> Yep - extended BZ with 2 new pictures - it's now crashing earlier within
> the call of acpi_bus_get_device().

Pretty much as expected.

So this is the problem I was thinking it was: the previous suspend-resume
cycle unregistered the struct acpi_device pointed to by dev->data in
pnpacpi_build_resource_template(), so the handle pointer in there is now
invalid.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-29 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <50A513A8.9010404@redhat.com>
2012-11-28 16:01 ` Acpi deadlocks with 3.7.0-rc4 Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 16:21   ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-28 17:02     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 17:27       ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-28 19:07         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 20:05           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-29 10:13           ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-29 10:59             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-29 12:26               ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-29 16:59                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-28 20:31         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-29  9:03           ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-29 10:09             ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2012-11-28 18:35     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1658287.3KNDf2oyAg@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=zkabelac@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox