public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Acpi deadlocks with 3.7.0-rc4
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:21:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B63A04.9010901@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFyLMmKuEvY6T2=vSHp_R4=ndqFEFNJsc3Axze2vYknKhg@mail.gmail.com>

Dne 28.11.2012 17:01, Linus Torvalds napsal(a):
> Adding more people (and the acpi list) to this report.
>
> I'm seeing *very* few changes to the core suspend/resume path in 3.7,
> and while there are some acpia updates, they seem to be pretty mild
> too.
>
> I think the acpi_os_wait_semaphore thing is a red herring - that's
> just stale on the stack.
>
> Do you have the register state from the oops? Or at least the "Code:"
> line? It would be nice to see exactly where the oops happens, and I
> cannot line up your "acpi_ns_lookup  + 0xa1/0x5b9" with any code due
> to different compilers (and configurations etc).
>
>                 Linus
>


I've opened  https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51071
and attached picture there which is all I have.

I'll try to decode exact code line.


In all cases - I've played even with 3.4 kernel - which also does not survive 
multiple resumes in docking station - though it just leaves black screen - so 
this oops is rather 'progress' and it also could be false path.

It's probably not a regression from 3.6 - since this problem was there for 
much longer - but now it has just become much more visible.

As I usually do not have reason to make multiple suspend/resumes in dock I've 
not noticed it until now when I've tried to capture this ACPI trace.

Zdenek


  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-28 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <50A513A8.9010404@redhat.com>
2012-11-28 16:01 ` Acpi deadlocks with 3.7.0-rc4 Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 16:21   ` Zdenek Kabelac [this message]
2012-11-28 17:02     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 17:27       ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-28 19:07         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 20:05           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-29 10:13           ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-29 10:59             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-29 12:26               ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-29 16:59                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-28 20:31         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-29  9:03           ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-29 10:09             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-28 18:35     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50B63A04.9010901@redhat.com \
    --to=zkabelac@redhat.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox