From: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Acpi deadlocks with 3.7.0-rc4
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:21:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B63A04.9010901@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFyLMmKuEvY6T2=vSHp_R4=ndqFEFNJsc3Axze2vYknKhg@mail.gmail.com>
Dne 28.11.2012 17:01, Linus Torvalds napsal(a):
> Adding more people (and the acpi list) to this report.
>
> I'm seeing *very* few changes to the core suspend/resume path in 3.7,
> and while there are some acpia updates, they seem to be pretty mild
> too.
>
> I think the acpi_os_wait_semaphore thing is a red herring - that's
> just stale on the stack.
>
> Do you have the register state from the oops? Or at least the "Code:"
> line? It would be nice to see exactly where the oops happens, and I
> cannot line up your "acpi_ns_lookup + 0xa1/0x5b9" with any code due
> to different compilers (and configurations etc).
>
> Linus
>
I've opened https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51071
and attached picture there which is all I have.
I'll try to decode exact code line.
In all cases - I've played even with 3.4 kernel - which also does not survive
multiple resumes in docking station - though it just leaves black screen - so
this oops is rather 'progress' and it also could be false path.
It's probably not a regression from 3.6 - since this problem was there for
much longer - but now it has just become much more visible.
As I usually do not have reason to make multiple suspend/resumes in dock I've
not noticed it until now when I've tried to capture this ACPI trace.
Zdenek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-28 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <50A513A8.9010404@redhat.com>
2012-11-28 16:01 ` Acpi deadlocks with 3.7.0-rc4 Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 16:21 ` Zdenek Kabelac [this message]
2012-11-28 17:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 17:27 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-28 19:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 20:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-29 10:13 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-29 10:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-29 12:26 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-29 16:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-28 20:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-29 9:03 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-11-29 10:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-28 18:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50B63A04.9010901@redhat.com \
--to=zkabelac@redhat.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox