* [PATCH v2 1/5] platform/x86: adv_swbutton: Check ACPI_HANDLE() against NULL
2026-05-12 15:10 [PATCH v2 0/5] platform/x86: Check ACPI_COMPANION() or ACPI_HANDLE() against NULL Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2026-05-12 15:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-05-12 15:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] platform/x86: hp_accel: Check ACPI_COMPANION() " Rafael J. Wysocki
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2026-05-12 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ilpo Järvinen
Cc: Hans de Goede, LKML, Linux ACPI, Andy Shevchenko,
platform-driver-x86, Andrea Ho, Eric Piel, Alex Hung,
Shravan Sudhakar, AceLan Kao
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Every platform driver can be forced to match a device that doesn't match
its list of device IDs because of device_match_driver_override(), so
platform drivers that rely on the existence of a device's ACPI companion
object need to verify its presence.
Accordingly, add a requisite ACPI_HANDLE() check against NULL to the
platform/x86 adv_swbutton driver.
Fixes: 3d904005f686 ("platform/x86: add support for Advantech software defined button")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/platform/x86/adv_swbutton.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/adv_swbutton.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/adv_swbutton.c
@@ -48,10 +48,14 @@ static int adv_swbutton_probe(struct pla
{
struct adv_swbutton *button;
struct input_dev *input;
- acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
+ acpi_handle handle;
acpi_status status;
int error;
+ handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
+ if (!handle)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
button = devm_kzalloc(&device->dev, sizeof(*button), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!button)
return -ENOMEM;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 2/5] platform/x86: hp_accel: Check ACPI_COMPANION() against NULL
2026-05-12 15:10 [PATCH v2 0/5] platform/x86: Check ACPI_COMPANION() or ACPI_HANDLE() against NULL Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-05-12 15:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] platform/x86: adv_swbutton: Check " Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2026-05-12 15:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-05-12 15:13 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] platform/x86: intel-hid: Check ACPI_HANDLE() " Rafael J. Wysocki
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2026-05-12 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ilpo Järvinen
Cc: Hans de Goede, LKML, Linux ACPI, Andy Shevchenko,
platform-driver-x86, Andrea Ho, Eric Piel, Alex Hung,
Shravan Sudhakar, AceLan Kao
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Every platform driver can be forced to match a device that doesn't match
its list of device IDs because of device_match_driver_override(), so
platform drivers that rely on the existence of a device's ACPI companion
object need to verify its presence.
Accordingly, add a requisite ACPI_COMPANION() check against NULL to the
platform/x86 hp_accel driver.
Fixes: 8ebcb6c94c71 ("platform/x86: hp_accel: Convert to be a platform driver")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/platform/x86/hp/hp_accel.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/hp/hp_accel.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/hp/hp_accel.c
@@ -300,6 +300,9 @@ static int lis3lv02d_probe(struct platfo
int ret;
lis3_dev.bus_priv = ACPI_COMPANION(&device->dev);
+ if (!lis3_dev.bus_priv)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
lis3_dev.init = lis3lv02d_acpi_init;
lis3_dev.read = lis3lv02d_acpi_read;
lis3_dev.write = lis3lv02d_acpi_write;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 3/5] platform/x86: intel-hid: Check ACPI_HANDLE() against NULL
2026-05-12 15:10 [PATCH v2 0/5] platform/x86: Check ACPI_COMPANION() or ACPI_HANDLE() against NULL Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-05-12 15:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] platform/x86: adv_swbutton: Check " Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-05-12 15:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] platform/x86: hp_accel: Check ACPI_COMPANION() " Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2026-05-12 15:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-05-12 15:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] platform/x86: intel_sar: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-05-12 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: " Rafael J. Wysocki
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2026-05-12 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ilpo Järvinen
Cc: Hans de Goede, LKML, Linux ACPI, Andy Shevchenko,
platform-driver-x86, Andrea Ho, Eric Piel, Alex Hung,
Shravan Sudhakar, AceLan Kao
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Every platform driver can be forced to match a device that doesn't match
its list of device IDs because of device_match_driver_override(), so
platform drivers that rely on the existence of a device's ACPI companion
object need to verify its presence.
Accordingly, add a requisite ACPI_HANDLE() check against NULL to the
platform/x86 intel-hid driver.
Fixes: ecc83e52b28c ("intel-hid: new hid event driver for hotkeys")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/platform/x86/intel/hid.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/hid.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/hid.c
@@ -688,12 +688,16 @@ static bool button_array_present(struct
static int intel_hid_probe(struct platform_device *device)
{
- acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
unsigned long long mode, dummy;
struct intel_hid_priv *priv;
+ acpi_handle handle;
acpi_status status;
int err;
+ handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
+ if (!handle)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
intel_hid_init_dsm(handle);
if (!intel_hid_evaluate_method(handle, INTEL_HID_DSM_HDMM_FN, &mode)) {
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 4/5] platform/x86: intel_sar: Check ACPI_HANDLE() against NULL
2026-05-12 15:10 [PATCH v2 0/5] platform/x86: Check ACPI_COMPANION() or ACPI_HANDLE() against NULL Rafael J. Wysocki
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-05-12 15:13 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] platform/x86: intel-hid: Check ACPI_HANDLE() " Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2026-05-12 15:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-05-12 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: " Rafael J. Wysocki
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2026-05-12 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ilpo Järvinen
Cc: Hans de Goede, LKML, Linux ACPI, Andy Shevchenko,
platform-driver-x86, Andrea Ho, Eric Piel, Alex Hung,
Shravan Sudhakar, AceLan Kao
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Every platform driver can be forced to match a device that doesn't match
its list of device IDs because of device_match_driver_override(), so
platform drivers that rely on the existence of a device's ACPI companion
object need to verify its presence.
Accordingly, add a requisite ACPI_HANDLE() check against NULL to the
platform/x86 intel_sar driver.
Fixes: dcfbd31ef4bc ("platform/x86: BIOS SAR driver for Intel M.2 Modem")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/platform/x86/intel/int1092/intel_sar.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int1092/intel_sar.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int1092/intel_sar.c
@@ -245,15 +245,20 @@ static void sar_get_data(int reg, struct
static int sar_probe(struct platform_device *device)
{
struct wwan_sar_context *context;
+ acpi_handle handle;
int reg;
int result;
+ handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
+ if (!handle)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
context = kzalloc_obj(*context);
if (!context)
return -ENOMEM;
context->sar_device = device;
- context->handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
+ context->handle = handle;
dev_set_drvdata(&device->dev, context);
result = guid_parse(SAR_DSM_UUID, &context->guid);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 5/5] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: Check ACPI_HANDLE() against NULL
2026-05-12 15:10 [PATCH v2 0/5] platform/x86: Check ACPI_COMPANION() or ACPI_HANDLE() against NULL Rafael J. Wysocki
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2026-05-12 15:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] platform/x86: intel_sar: " Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2026-05-12 15:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2026-05-12 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ilpo Järvinen
Cc: Hans de Goede, LKML, Linux ACPI, Andy Shevchenko,
platform-driver-x86, Andrea Ho, Eric Piel, Alex Hung,
Shravan Sudhakar, AceLan Kao
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Every platform driver can be forced to match a device that doesn't match
its list of device IDs because of device_match_driver_override(), so
platform drivers that rely on the existence of a device's ACPI companion
object need to verify its presence.
Accordingly, add a requisite ACPI_HANDLE() check against NULL to the
platform/x86 intel-vbtn driver.
Fixes: 26173179fae1 ("platform/x86: intel-vbtn: Eval VBDL after registering our notifier")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/platform/x86/intel/vbtn.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vbtn.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vbtn.c
@@ -275,12 +275,16 @@ static bool intel_vbtn_has_switches(acpi
static int intel_vbtn_probe(struct platform_device *device)
{
- acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
bool dual_accel, has_buttons, has_switches;
struct intel_vbtn_priv *priv;
+ acpi_handle handle;
acpi_status status;
int err;
+ handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
+ if (!handle)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
dual_accel = dual_accel_detect();
has_buttons = acpi_has_method(handle, "VBDL");
has_switches = intel_vbtn_has_switches(handle, dual_accel);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread