RE: [PATCH/RFC 0/4]Bind physical devices with ACPI devices

RE: [PATCH/RFC 0/4]Bind physical devices with ACPI devices

[Yu, Luming]

>On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 10:46:30PM +0800, Yu, Luming wrote:
>> >All we need is an acpi_get_gendev_handle that takes a 
>struct device and
>> >returns the acpi_handle for it.  Now, maybe that'd be best 
>> >done by placing
>> >a pointer in the struct device, but I bet it'd be just as 
>good to walk
>> >the namespace looking for the corresponding device.
>> 
>>   It will fail if you just simply walk namespace to find out 
>> the corresponding acpi object, because there are NO
>> hardware id or compatible id  can be passed in.
>> Please check function acpi_bus_match.
>
>It doesn't need the HID or CID.  Look at Shaohua's patches -- 
>they don't
>use HID or CID either.
>
Yes, I made a mistake, please forget that point.

But another statement I made should be valid.
That is how to use geographical address to
locate corresponding acpi object.

For example,  ACPI define IDE as the following:

Device (IDE0){ /* primary controller */
	Name (_ADR, 0)
	Method (_GTM )
	...
	Device(PRIM) /* primary adapter */
		Name (_ADR, 0)
		Method(_GTM)
		...
		Device(MSTR) /* master channel */
			Name (_ADR,0)
			Method(_GTF)

  We need not only able to locate acpi object IDE0
but also we need to locate object PRIM underneath
IDE0,  and MSTR underneath PRIM. Thus, IDE driver 
can fully take advantage from ACPI, in terms of 
configuration and power management.

  Maybe we need to invent a method called
map_device_addr_to_acpi_handle to be  generic solution.

Thanks,
Luming


  





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idU88&alloc_id\x12065&op=click

Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/4]Bind physical devices with ACPI devices

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 12:08:03AM +0800, Yu, Luming wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 10:46:30PM +0800, Yu, Luming wrote:
> >> >All we need is an acpi_get_gendev_handle that takes a 
> >struct device and
> >> >returns the acpi_handle for it.  Now, maybe that'd be best 
> >> >done by placing
> >> >a pointer in the struct device, but I bet it'd be just as 
> >good to walk
> >> >the namespace looking for the corresponding device.
> 
>   We need not only able to locate acpi object IDE0
> but also we need to locate object PRIM underneath
> IDE0,  and MSTR underneath PRIM. Thus, IDE driver 
> can fully take advantage from ACPI, in terms of 
> configuration and power management.
> 
>   Maybe we need to invent a method called
> map_device_addr_to_acpi_handle to be  generic solution.

I think we're saying the same thing in different words here ...

Note that an acpi_get_gendev_handle() or map_device_addr_to_acpi_handle()
function doesn't *preclude* putting a void * in struct device.  It does
let us choose whether or not to do so.

-- 
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon 
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse
to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince 
himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep 
he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click

RE: [PATCH/RFC 0/4]Bind physical devices with ACPI devices

[Yu, Luming]

>All we need is an acpi_get_gendev_handle that takes a struct device and
>returns the acpi_handle for it.  Now, maybe that'd be best 
>done by placing
>a pointer in the struct device, but I bet it'd be just as good to walk
>the namespace looking for the corresponding device.

  It will fail if you just simply walk namespace to find out 
the corresponding acpi object, because there are NO
hardware id or compatible id  can be passed in.
Please check function acpi_bus_match.
  The fundamental problem here is how to use device's geographical
address( or other information ) to locate the corresponding 
acpi object in namespace.

Thanks,
Luming
 






-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idU88&alloc_id\x12065&op=click

Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/4]Bind physical devices with ACPI devices

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 10:46:30PM +0800, Yu, Luming wrote:
> >All we need is an acpi_get_gendev_handle that takes a struct device and
> >returns the acpi_handle for it.  Now, maybe that'd be best 
> >done by placing
> >a pointer in the struct device, but I bet it'd be just as good to walk
> >the namespace looking for the corresponding device.
> 
>   It will fail if you just simply walk namespace to find out 
> the corresponding acpi object, because there are NO
> hardware id or compatible id  can be passed in.
> Please check function acpi_bus_match.

It doesn't need the HID or CID.  Look at Shaohua's patches -- they don't
use HID or CID either.

-- 
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon 
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse
to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince 
himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep 
he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click

[PATCH/RFC 0/4]Bind physical devices with ACPI devices

[Li Shaohua]

Hi,
ACPI provides many functionalities for physical devices. Such as for
suspend/resume, ACPI can tell us correct devices D-state for S3. There
are tons of devices enhancement for both realtime and boot time from
ACPI. To utilize ACPI, physical devices like PCI devices must know its
partner. The patches try to do this. After this is done, we can enhance
many features, such as improve suspend/resume.
These patches are against 2.6.10-rc1, please give your comments.

Thanks,
Shaohua