From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 14365] New: resume from suspend to ram broken after suspend to disk
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:30:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200910102330.33297.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091010103905.7bc562c3.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Saturday 10 October 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:40:45 GMT bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
>
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14365
> >
> > Summary: resume from suspend to ram broken after suspend to
> > disk
> > Product: Power Management
> > Version: 2.5
> > Kernel Version: 2.6.31
> > Platform: All
> > OS/Version: Linux
> > Tree: Mainline
> > Status: NEW
> > Severity: normal
> > Priority: P1
> > Component: Hibernation/Suspend
> > AssignedTo: power-management_other@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
> > ReportedBy: corsac@debian.org
> > Regression: No
>
> It worries me that we have both "Power management, Hibernation/Suspend"
> and acpi-power-sleep-wake.
>
> Are these duplicative?
acpi-power-sleep-wake is more specific. Hibernation/Suspend bugs need not be.
about ACPI.
> Should we kill one off?
I don't think that's necessary.
> Do the acpi developers monitor the "Power Management" category?
Yes, they do, to my knowledge.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-10 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-14365-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2009-10-10 17:39 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 14365] New: resume from suspend to ram broken after suspend to disk Andrew Morton
2009-10-10 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200910102330.33297.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox