* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 14365] New: resume from suspend to ram broken after suspend to disk
[not found] <bug-14365-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
@ 2009-10-10 17:39 ` Andrew Morton
2009-10-10 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2009-10-10 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-acpi; +Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:40:45 GMT bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14365
>
> Summary: resume from suspend to ram broken after suspend to
> disk
> Product: Power Management
> Version: 2.5
> Kernel Version: 2.6.31
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P1
> Component: Hibernation/Suspend
> AssignedTo: power-management_other@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
> ReportedBy: corsac@debian.org
> Regression: No
It worries me that we have both "Power management, Hibernation/Suspend"
and acpi-power-sleep-wake.
Are these duplicative?
Should we kill one off?
Do the acpi developers monitor the "Power Management" category?
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 14365] New: resume from suspend to ram broken after suspend to disk
2009-10-10 17:39 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 14365] New: resume from suspend to ram broken after suspend to disk Andrew Morton
@ 2009-10-10 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-10 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-acpi, Len Brown
On Saturday 10 October 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:40:45 GMT bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
>
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14365
> >
> > Summary: resume from suspend to ram broken after suspend to
> > disk
> > Product: Power Management
> > Version: 2.5
> > Kernel Version: 2.6.31
> > Platform: All
> > OS/Version: Linux
> > Tree: Mainline
> > Status: NEW
> > Severity: normal
> > Priority: P1
> > Component: Hibernation/Suspend
> > AssignedTo: power-management_other@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
> > ReportedBy: corsac@debian.org
> > Regression: No
>
> It worries me that we have both "Power management, Hibernation/Suspend"
> and acpi-power-sleep-wake.
>
> Are these duplicative?
acpi-power-sleep-wake is more specific. Hibernation/Suspend bugs need not be.
about ACPI.
> Should we kill one off?
I don't think that's necessary.
> Do the acpi developers monitor the "Power Management" category?
Yes, they do, to my knowledge.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-10-10 21:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-14365-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2009-10-10 17:39 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 14365] New: resume from suspend to ram broken after suspend to disk Andrew Morton
2009-10-10 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox