* Re: [PATCH 1/2] intel-rst: Use ACPI_FAILURE() macro instead !ACPI_SUCCESS() for error checking [not found] ` <1410902036-10282-2-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com> @ 2014-09-16 22:49 ` Darren Hart 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Darren Hart @ 2014-09-16 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Ujfalusi; +Cc: mjg59, platform-driver-x86, linux-kernel, linux-acpi On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:13:55AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > ACPI_SUCCESS is defined as: > #define ACPI_SUCCESS(a) (!(a)) > > There is no need for the the double ! since there is already a macro > defined for failures: ACPI_FAILURE() > Cc: linux-acpi Thanks, Darren > Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c > index d45bca3..8c6a8fe 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static ssize_t irst_show_wakeup_events(struct device *dev, > acpi = to_acpi_device(dev); > > status = acpi_evaluate_integer(acpi->handle, "GFFS", NULL, &value); > - if (!ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) > + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) > return -EINVAL; > > return sprintf(buf, "%lld\n", value); > @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static ssize_t irst_store_wakeup_events(struct device *dev, > > status = acpi_execute_simple_method(acpi->handle, "SFFS", value); > > - if (!ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) > + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) > return -EINVAL; > > return count; > @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static ssize_t irst_show_wakeup_time(struct device *dev, > acpi = to_acpi_device(dev); > > status = acpi_evaluate_integer(acpi->handle, "GFTV", NULL, &value); > - if (!ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) > + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) > return -EINVAL; > > return sprintf(buf, "%lld\n", value); > @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static ssize_t irst_store_wakeup_time(struct device *dev, > > status = acpi_execute_simple_method(acpi->handle, "SFTV", value); > > - if (!ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) > + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) > return -EINVAL; > > return count; > -- > 2.1.0 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1410902036-10282-3-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com>]
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] intel-rst: Clean up ACPI add function [not found] ` <1410902036-10282-3-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com> @ 2014-09-16 23:25 ` Darren Hart 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Darren Hart @ 2014-09-16 23:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Ujfalusi; +Cc: mjg59, platform-driver-x86, linux-kernel, linux-acpi On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:13:56AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > There is no need to initialize the error since it is going to be assigned > with the return status of at least on of the device_create_file() call. > > We can return directly in case the first file creation fails. > All the labels for goto can be removed (along with the gotos) as well. > Tell the compiler that the failures are unlikely so it can create better > binaries. Looks reasonable to me. Cc: linux-acpi > > Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c | 15 +++++---------- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c > index 8c6a8fe..7344d84 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c > @@ -119,21 +119,16 @@ static struct device_attribute irst_timeout_attr = { > > static int irst_add(struct acpi_device *acpi) > { > - int error = 0; > + int error; > > error = device_create_file(&acpi->dev, &irst_timeout_attr); > - if (error) > - goto out; > + if (unlikely(error)) > + return error; > > error = device_create_file(&acpi->dev, &irst_wakeup_attr); > - if (error) > - goto out_timeout; > + if (unlikely(error)) > + device_remove_file(&acpi->dev, &irst_timeout_attr); > > - return 0; > - > -out_timeout: > - device_remove_file(&acpi->dev, &irst_timeout_attr); > -out: > return error; > } > > -- > 2.1.0 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-16 23:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1410902036-10282-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1410902036-10282-2-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com>
2014-09-16 22:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] intel-rst: Use ACPI_FAILURE() macro instead !ACPI_SUCCESS() for error checking Darren Hart
[not found] ` <1410902036-10282-3-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com>
2014-09-16 23:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] intel-rst: Clean up ACPI add function Darren Hart
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox