From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Andrea Tomassetti <andrea.tomassetti@sipearl.com>
Cc: "jassisinghbrar@gmail.com" <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"lkp@intel.com" <lkp@intel.com>,
"oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev" <oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev>,
Olivier Dautricourt <Olivier.Dautricourt@sipearl.com>,
"olivierdautricourt@gmail.com" <olivierdautricourt@gmail.com>,
"rafael@kernel.org" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Thibault Cantori <thibault.cantori@sipearl.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mailbox: pcc: support polling mode when there is no platform IRQ
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 11:11:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251209-singing-organic-jackal-b8f2ec@sudeepholla> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aTf8bzYaOPe9naLN@dc2pvlnosz001.pub.int.sipearl.com>
On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 10:39:53AM +0000, Andrea Tomassetti wrote:
> On 25/12/04 01:14PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >
> > I wouldn't consider that as real platform especially if it is not std. AEM
> > models that are well maintained. Many Fast models are short lived and never
> > maintained long term, so I don't want to push any feature based on that alone
> > unless you have a real platform with missing or broken interrupt that needs
> > this polling feature.
> >
> > It is burden for long term maintenance if there is no regular way to test this
> > polling mode feature.
> >
> Fair, I totally get your point. Thank you very much for your time.
>
Thanks for understanding. We can always revisit this if this becomes a
requirement on a real platform in the future. I am not against that just FYI.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-09 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-10 15:08 [PATCH] mailbox: pcc: support polling mode when there is no platform IRQ Andrea Tomassetti
2025-11-11 18:29 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-11 21:47 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-12 0:07 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-19 9:01 ` [PATCH v2] " Andrea Tomassetti
2025-11-27 14:51 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-12-02 10:12 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Andrea Tomassetti
2025-12-03 10:28 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-12-04 12:59 ` Andrea Tomassetti
2025-12-04 13:14 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-12-09 10:39 ` Andrea Tomassetti
2025-12-09 11:11 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2025-12-02 10:12 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mailbox: pcc: add peek_data handler Andrea Tomassetti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251209-singing-organic-jackal-b8f2ec@sudeepholla \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=Olivier.Dautricourt@sipearl.com \
--cc=andrea.tomassetti@sipearl.com \
--cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=olivierdautricourt@gmail.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=thibault.cantori@sipearl.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox