[PATCH V1 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Honor IORT Root Complex PASID descriptors

[Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>]

The SMMUv3 driver currently calls pci_enable_pasid() for any PCI
master that exposes a PASID capability, regardless of whether the
upstream Root Complex actually supports PASID and regardless of the
RC's declared Max PASID Width. With IORT spec E.c (RC node revision
>= 4) firmware reports both, so we can do better:

  - If the IORT Root Complex node says PASID is not supported
    (Flags bit 0 == 0 at byte offset 36), enabling PASID on the
    endpoint is futile - the RC will not forward the PASID prefix to
    the SMMU - so skip pci_enable_pasid() silently.

  - If the IORT Root Complex node reports a Max PASID Width (bits[4:0]
    of PASID Capabilities at offset 33), clamp the endpoint's
    pci_max_pasids() result by 1 << width before computing the SMMU
    SSID width. This prevents master->ssid_bits from exceeding what
    the RC can actually carry.

Both behaviours are gated on iort_pci_rc_pasid_max_width_known(), i.e.
RC node revision >= 4, so platforms with older IORT firmware see no
behavioural change and continue to enable PASID purely on the basis
of the endpoint capability.

Use the new IOMMU_FWSPEC_PCI_RC_PASID fwspec flag (set by IORT) for
the support check, and call iort_pci_rc_pasid_max_width_for_dev() for
the width clamp; both pieces are wired up in
iort_iommu_configure_id() by the previous patch.

Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index e8d7dbe495f0..2b269307fd33 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -3071,16 +3071,28 @@ static void arm_smmu_enable_ats(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
 
 static int arm_smmu_enable_pasid(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
 {
-	int ret;
-	int features;
-	int num_pasids;
+	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(master->dev);
 	struct pci_dev *pdev;
+	int features, num_pasids, ret, rc_width;
 
 	if (!dev_is_pci(master->dev))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	pdev = to_pci_dev(master->dev);
 
+	/*
+	 * IORT E.c (RC node revision >= 4) reports whether the root
+	 * complex actually supports PASID. If it does not, enabling
+	 * PASID on the endpoint is futile - the RC will not forward
+	 * the PASID prefix - so skip silently. Older firmware is
+	 * treated as "unknown / assume supported" to preserve the
+	 * pre-E.c behaviour.
+	 */
+	if (fwspec &&
+	    !(fwspec->flags & IOMMU_FWSPEC_PCI_RC_PASID) &&
+	    iort_pci_rc_pasid_max_width_known(master->dev))
+		return 0;
+
 	features = pci_pasid_features(pdev);
 	if (features < 0)
 		return features;
@@ -3089,6 +3101,14 @@ static int arm_smmu_enable_pasid(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
 	if (num_pasids <= 0)
 		return num_pasids;
 
+	/* Clamp by what the root complex can carry, when known. */
+	rc_width = iort_pci_rc_pasid_max_width_for_dev(master->dev);
+	if (rc_width >= 0)
+		num_pasids = min_t(int, num_pasids, 1 << rc_width);
+
+	if (num_pasids <= 1)
+		return 0;
+
 	ret = pci_enable_pasid(pdev, features);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to enable PASID\n");
-- 
2.25.1