Linux ACPI
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Marco Scardovi <scardracs@disroot.org>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <westeri@kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: acpi: fix out-of-bounds pointer arithmetic in acpi_gpio_package_count
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 07:17:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260601051735.GN3102@black.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260530094012.184276-3-scardracs@disroot.org>

On Sat, May 30, 2026 at 11:40:12AM +0200, Marco Scardovi wrote:
> When counting GPIOs in an ACPI package, encountering a reference or
> string causes the element pointer to be advanced by 3 (element += 3)
> and then by 1 (element++).
> 
> If a malformed ACPI package contains fewer than 4 remaining elements
> when a reference or string is processed, this pointer arithmetic
> advances the element pointer past the end of the package elements
> array. This results in undefined behavior and can cause out-of-bounds
> reads.

How can it cause out-of-bounds reads? We increase "element" but the next
iteration checks that it is still inside "end" and it's never dereferenced.
Maybe I'm missing something?

> Fix this by ensuring at least 4 elements remain in the package before
> advancing the element pointer, returning -EPROTO if the package
> structure is invalid.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marco Scardovi <scardracs@disroot.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi-core.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi-core.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi-core.c
> index 049e4cbc14ed..494dcd166aef 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi-core.c
> @@ -1310,6 +1310,8 @@ static int acpi_gpio_package_count(const union acpi_object *obj)
>  		switch (element->type) {
>  		case ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE:
>  		case ACPI_TYPE_STRING:
> +			if (end - element < 4)
> +				return -EPROTO;
>  			element += 3;
>  			fallthrough;
>  		case ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER:
> -- 
> 2.54.0

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-01  5:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-30  9:40 [PATCH 0/2] gpiolib: acpi: fix bounds-checking bugs in GPIO ACPI core Marco Scardovi
2026-05-30  9:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: acpi: prevent address truncation in OperationRegion handler Marco Scardovi
2026-06-01  5:02   ` Mika Westerberg
2026-06-01  6:31     ` Marco Scardovi
2026-05-30  9:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: acpi: fix out-of-bounds pointer arithmetic in acpi_gpio_package_count Marco Scardovi
2026-06-01  5:17   ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2026-06-01  6:31     ` Marco Scardovi
2026-06-01  7:17       ` Mika Westerberg
2026-06-01  7:53         ` Marco Scardovi
2026-06-02  7:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] gpiolib: acpi: fix bounds-checking bugs in GPIO ACPI core Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-02  7:59   ` Marco Scardovi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260601051735.GN3102@black.igk.intel.com \
    --to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=brgl@kernel.org \
    --cc=linusw@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=scardracs@disroot.org \
    --cc=westeri@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox