Linux ACPI
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Scardovi <scardracs@disroot.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <westeri@kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpiolib: acpi: fix bounds-checking bugs in GPIO ACPI core
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 09:59:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2QvGwYNxRj2rEr3AgUt9Pg@disroot.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ah6Lzn4NbilZQwvy@ashevche-desk.local>

In data martedì 2 giugno 2026 09:52:46 Ora legale dell’Europa centrale, Andy 
Shevchenko ha scritto:
> On Sat, May 30, 2026 at 11:40:10AM +0200, Marco Scardovi wrote:
> > While reviewing drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi-core.c in linux-next,
> > I noticed two bounds-checking issues in the ACPI GPIO handling paths.
> > 
> > The first issue is in acpi_gpio_adr_space_handler(), where the
> > 64-bit ACPI OperationRegion address is truncated to u16 before
> > validation against pin_table_length. This can cause out-of-range
> > addresses to wrap around and access unintended GPIO entries.
> > 
> > Depending on platform firmware configuration, this could potentially
> > affect GPIO lines associated with sensitive hardware controls.
> > 
> > The second issue is in acpi_gpio_package_count(), where malformed
> > _DSD packages can cause pointer advancement past the package end
> > during element parsing, potentially resulting in out-of-bounds reads.
> > 
> > This series fixes both issues by:
> > 
> > - Validating the full address range before truncation
> > - Making the length calculation overflow-safe
> > - Validating remaining package elements before pointer advancement
> > 
> > The fixes are intentionally minimal and preserve the existing
> > behavior of capping ranges that extend past the end of the pin table.
> > 
> > Patch 1 also converts the related loop variables to unsigned types
> > for consistency with the updated arithmetic.
> 
> You got me lost. There was v3 of something, what is this?!

Hi Andy,

yes I messed up the patches on my side and made way too noise for my own, and 
yours, peace of mind. Please don't consider this thread anymore.




      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-02  7:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-30  9:40 [PATCH 0/2] gpiolib: acpi: fix bounds-checking bugs in GPIO ACPI core Marco Scardovi
2026-05-30  9:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: acpi: prevent address truncation in OperationRegion handler Marco Scardovi
2026-06-01  5:02   ` Mika Westerberg
2026-06-01  6:31     ` Marco Scardovi
2026-05-30  9:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: acpi: fix out-of-bounds pointer arithmetic in acpi_gpio_package_count Marco Scardovi
2026-06-01  5:17   ` Mika Westerberg
2026-06-01  6:31     ` Marco Scardovi
2026-06-01  7:17       ` Mika Westerberg
2026-06-01  7:53         ` Marco Scardovi
2026-06-02  7:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] gpiolib: acpi: fix bounds-checking bugs in GPIO ACPI core Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-02  7:59   ` Marco Scardovi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2QvGwYNxRj2rEr3AgUt9Pg@disroot.org \
    --to=scardracs@disroot.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=brgl@kernel.org \
    --cc=linusw@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=westeri@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox