Linux ACPI
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rafael@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de,
	guohanjun@huawei.com, mchehab@kernel.org,
	xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com, terry.bowman@amd.com,
	sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 08/10] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Validate memory error section length before payload access
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:16:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260717161647.1493259-9-dave.jiang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260717161647.1493259-1-dave.jiang@intel.com>

sashiko-bot flagged that the memory error length check was placed too
late, leaving the other payload consumers unprotected.

ghes_do_proc() hands the CPER_SEC_PLATFORM_MEM payload to the report
chain, arch_apei_report_mem_error() and ghes_handle_memory_failure()
without checking gdata->error_data_length. These read validation_bits
and physical_addr (offsets 0 and 16), so a shorter section reads past the
record.

Validate error_data_length once in ghes_do_proc(), before any consumer
runs, so every consumer is covered. Bound against struct
cper_sec_mem_err_old (the UEFI 2.1/2.2 layout) rather than the full
struct: the section length is authoritative, older firmware legitimately
emits the shorter record, and the trailing fields, though packed
unconditionally by cper_mem_err_pack(), are only acted on under
validation bits that a short record leaves clear. This matches the lower
bound already used in drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c.

A malformed sub-record no longer reaches ghes_handle_memory_failure().

Reported-by: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260714231835.303081-1-dave.jiang@intel.com?part=7
Fixes: ca104edc1784 ("ACPI, APEI, GHES: Cleanup ghes memory error handling")
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
---
v3:
- Move the length check into ghes_do_proc() so the report chain and arch
  reporter are covered too, and bound against the older UEFI 2.1/2.2
  layout instead of the full struct (sashiko).
---
 drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
index b8dbd99da47e..1d2966a437bd 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
@@ -940,6 +940,17 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
 		if (guid_equal(sec_type, &CPER_SEC_PLATFORM_MEM)) {
 			struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
 
+			/*
+			 * Several consumers below dereference the record, so
+			 * check the length once here. Bound against the shorter
+			 * UEFI 2.1/2.2 layout that older firmware still emits;
+			 * the extra fields are only used under validation bits
+			 * such records leave clear.
+			 */
+			if (gdata->error_data_length <
+			    sizeof(struct cper_sec_mem_err_old))
+				continue;
+
 			atomic_notifier_call_chain(&ghes_report_chain, sev, mem_err);
 
 			arch_apei_report_mem_error(sev, mem_err);
-- 
2.55.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-17 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-17 16:16 [PATCH v3 00/10] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Collection of fixes for issues reported by sashiko Dave Jiang
2026-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Bound CXL event record copy to the firmware section length Dave Jiang
2026-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] efi/cper: Reject CPER records with an out-of-range error_data_length Dave Jiang
2026-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Validate CXL protocol error section length before RAS cap copy Dave Jiang
2026-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] ACPI: extlog: Avoid populating software AER metadata from raw hardware buffer Dave Jiang
2026-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] ACPI: extlog: Validate PCIe error section length before payload access Dave Jiang
2026-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] ACPI: extlog: Defer CXL protocol error handling to avoid lock inversion Dave Jiang
2026-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] ACPI: extlog: Fix CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER guard typo Dave Jiang
2026-07-17 21:24   ` Dave Jiang
2026-07-17 16:16 ` Dave Jiang [this message]
2026-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Bound AER info copy and sanitize software metadata Dave Jiang
2026-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] ACPI: extlog: Validate elog record length before walking sections Dave Jiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260717161647.1493259-9-dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox