* [PATCH v1] platform/surface: surfacepro3_button: Check ACPI_COMPANION()
@ 2026-05-12 16:30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-05-12 16:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2026-05-12 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ilpo Järvinen
Cc: Chen Yu, Hans de Goede, platform-driver-x86, Maximilian Luz,
Andy Shevchenko, LKML, Linux ACPI
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Every platform driver can be forced to match a device that doesn't match
its list of device IDs because of device_match_driver_override(), so
platform drivers that rely on the existence of a device's ACPI companion
object need to verify its presence.
Accordingly, add a requisite ACPI_COMPANION() check against NULL to the
surfacepro3_button driver.
Fixes: d913a5a12b40 ("platform/surface: surfacepro3_button: Convert to a platform driver")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/platform/surface/surfacepro3_button.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/platform/surface/surfacepro3_button.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/surface/surfacepro3_button.c
@@ -185,12 +185,15 @@ static bool surface_button_check_MSHW004
static int surface_button_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
- struct acpi_device *device = ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev);
struct surface_button *button;
+ struct acpi_device *device;
struct input_dev *input;
- const char *hid = acpi_device_hid(device);
int error;
+ device = ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev);
+ if (!device)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
if (strncmp(acpi_device_bid(device), SURFACE_BUTTON_OBJ_NAME,
strlen(SURFACE_BUTTON_OBJ_NAME)))
return -ENODEV;
@@ -210,7 +213,8 @@ static int surface_button_probe(struct p
}
strscpy(acpi_device_name(device), SURFACE_BUTTON_DEVICE_NAME);
- snprintf(button->phys, sizeof(button->phys), "%s/buttons", hid);
+ snprintf(button->phys, sizeof(button->phys), "%s/buttons",
+ acpi_device_hid(device));
input->name = acpi_device_name(device);
input->phys = button->phys;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v1] platform/surface: surfacepro3_button: Check ACPI_COMPANION()
2026-05-12 16:30 [PATCH v1] platform/surface: surfacepro3_button: Check ACPI_COMPANION() Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2026-05-12 16:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-12 16:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2026-05-12 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Ilpo Järvinen, Chen Yu, Hans de Goede, platform-driver-x86,
Maximilian Luz, LKML, Linux ACPI
On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 06:30:26PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Every platform driver can be forced to match a device that doesn't match
> its list of device IDs because of device_match_driver_override(), so
> platform drivers that rely on the existence of a device's ACPI companion
> object need to verify its presence.
>
> Accordingly, add a requisite ACPI_COMPANION() check against NULL to the
> surfacepro3_button driver.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
...
> strscpy(acpi_device_name(device), SURFACE_BUTTON_DEVICE_NAME);
> - snprintf(button->phys, sizeof(button->phys), "%s/buttons", hid);
> + snprintf(button->phys, sizeof(button->phys), "%s/buttons",
> + acpi_device_hid(device));
I'm wondering if some CIs will now generate a snprintf() warning
(this was in the original code if the compiler can prove no truncation
of the string, though).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] platform/surface: surfacepro3_button: Check ACPI_COMPANION()
2026-05-12 16:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2026-05-12 16:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2026-05-12 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Shevchenko
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Ilpo Järvinen, Chen Yu, Hans de Goede,
platform-driver-x86, Maximilian Luz, LKML, Linux ACPI
On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 6:42 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 06:30:26PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > Every platform driver can be forced to match a device that doesn't match
> > its list of device IDs because of device_match_driver_override(), so
> > platform drivers that rely on the existence of a device's ACPI companion
> > object need to verify its presence.
> >
> > Accordingly, add a requisite ACPI_COMPANION() check against NULL to the
> > surfacepro3_button driver.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Thanks!
> ...
>
> > strscpy(acpi_device_name(device), SURFACE_BUTTON_DEVICE_NAME);
> > - snprintf(button->phys, sizeof(button->phys), "%s/buttons", hid);
> > + snprintf(button->phys, sizeof(button->phys), "%s/buttons",
> > + acpi_device_hid(device));
>
> I'm wondering if some CIs will now generate a snprintf() warning
> (this was in the original code if the compiler can prove no truncation
> of the string, though).
Then I can send another patch to make that warning go away ...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-12 16:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-12 16:30 [PATCH v1] platform/surface: surfacepro3_button: Check ACPI_COMPANION() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-05-12 16:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-12 16:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox