Linux ACPI
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	P HeLiOn <perryhelionsemail@gmail.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / LPSS: Avoid PM quirks on suspend and resume from S3
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 10:50:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <24724042.UC9DsrE2FJ@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76C1A830-EEE1-486B-9B06-6C915C269278@canonical.com>

On Thursday, July 26, 2018 10:15:03 AM CEST Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> 
> > On 2018Jul26, at 16:14, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 5:46 AM, Kai-Heng Feng
> > <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Rafael,
> >> 
> >>> On 2018Jul24, at 18:36, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 11:13:42 AM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 10:46:09 AM CEST Kai Heng Feng wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Rafael,
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>> On Jun 13, 2018, at 7:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> It is reported that commit a192aa923b66a (ACPI / LPSS: Consolidate
> >>>>>> runtime PM and system sleep handling) introduced a system suspend
> >>>>>> regression on some machines, but the only functional change made by
> >>>>>> it was to cause the PM quirks in the LPSS to also be used during
> >>>>>> system suspend and resume.  While that should always work for
> >>>>>> suspend-to-idle, it turns out to be problematic for S3
> >>>>>> (suspend-to-RAM).
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> To address that issue restore the previous S3 suspend and resume
> >>>>>> behavior of the LPSS to avoid applying PM quirks then.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> The users reported that this patch does fix the S3 issue, but the S4 still
> >>>>> fails.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Please refer to [1] for more for user's testing result.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1774950/comments/60
> >>>> 
> >>>> Please ask the users to test the patch below, then, on top of the $subject one.
> >>> 
> >>> There was a mistake in the previous patch I posted, sorry about that.
> >>> 
> >>> Please test this one instead:
> >> 
> >> The result is positive, thanks!
> > 
> > Good, thanks!
> > 
> > I assume that S3 still works with this patch applied too.
> 
> Yes, S3 continues to work with this patch.

OK, thanks!

Let me resend the patch with a proper subject and changelog, then.

      reply	other threads:[~2018-07-26  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-11  6:26 Possible regression caused by commit a192aa923b66a Kai-Heng Feng
2018-06-11  8:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-06-11 21:52   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-06-12  9:17     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-06-13  2:45       ` Kai Heng Feng
2018-06-13  7:53         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-06-13 11:17         ` [PATCH] ACPI / LPSS: Avoid PM quirks on suspend and resume from S3 Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-06-13 11:54           ` Ulf Hansson
2018-06-13 12:53           ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-06-13 12:58             ` Mika Westerberg
2018-07-24  8:46           ` Kai Heng Feng
2018-07-24  9:13             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-24 10:36               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-26  3:46                 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2018-07-26  8:14                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-26  8:15                     ` Kai-Heng Feng
2018-07-26  8:50                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=24724042.UC9DsrE2FJ@aspire.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=perryhelionsemail@gmail.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox