Re: [PATCH 3/3] mailbox: pcc: fix 'pcc_chan_count' when fail to initialize PCC

["lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@huawei.com>]

在 2022/11/10 18:44, Sudeep Holla 写道:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 09:50:34AM +0800, Huisong Li wrote:
>> Currently, 'pcc_chan_count' is a non-zero value if PCC subspaces are parsed
>> successfully and subsequent processes is failure during initializing PCC
>> process. This may cause that pcc_mbox_request_channel() can still be
>> executed successfully , which will misleads the caller that this channel is
>> available.
>>
>> Fixes: ce028702ddbc ("mailbox: pcc: Move bulk of PCCT parsing into pcc_mbox_probe")
>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/mailbox/pcc.c | 11 ++++++++---
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c b/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
>> index 7cee37dd3b73..47d70c5884e3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
>> @@ -294,6 +294,7 @@ pcc_mbox_request_channel(struct mbox_client *cl, int subspace_id)
>>   		pr_err("Channel not found for idx: %d\n", subspace_id);
>>   		return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
>>   	}
>> +
> Spurious/not needed change ?
Ack
>
>>   	dev = chan->mbox->dev;
>>   
>>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&chan->lock, flags);
>> @@ -735,7 +736,8 @@ static int __init pcc_init(void)
>>   
>>   	if (ret) {
>>   		pr_debug("ACPI PCC probe failed.\n");
>> -		return -ENODEV;
>> +		ret = -ENODEV;
>> +		goto out;
> Not needed, we don't set pcc_chan_count if the probe failed.
You are right. will fix it in v2, thanks.
>
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	pcc_pdev = platform_create_bundle(&pcc_mbox_driver,
>> @@ -743,10 +745,13 @@ static int __init pcc_init(void)
>>   
>>   	if (IS_ERR(pcc_pdev)) {
>>   		pr_debug("Err creating PCC platform bundle\n");
>> -		return PTR_ERR(pcc_pdev);
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(pcc_pdev);
> You just need to set pcc_chan_count to 0 here, so no need for goto.
Ack
>