From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, August Wikerfors <git@augustwikerfors.se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: resource: revert "Remove "Zen" specific match and quirks"
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 19:06:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4fae943f-6e72-3297-cc73-e1087e7a45bd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561f0807-a78c-4dab-b8ef-a0f0836902d9@amd.com>
Hi,
On 8/7/23 13:39, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>> We haven't even given a try to fixing it; I think the revert is still hasty.
>>>
>>> I don't have a machine that can reproduce this failure, but I did confirm that my keyboard still works with this:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/resource.c b/drivers/acpi/resource.c
>>> index 1dd8d5aebf678..b74d7d8cc8630 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/resource.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/resource.c
>>> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
>>> #include <linux/dmi.h>
>>>
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_X86
>>> -#define valid_IRQ(i) (((i) != 0) && ((i) != 2))
>>> +#define valid_IRQ(i) ((i) > 2)
>>> static inline bool acpi_iospace_resource_valid(struct resource *res)
>>> {
>>> /* On X86 IO space is limited to the [0 - 64K] IO port range */
>>>
>>> Can we perhaps see if that works instead for some affected people?
>>
>> That does not just skip the override stuff, it will make the kernel return irqresource_disabled(res, 1) for the kbd IRQ:
>>
>> static inline void irqresource_disabled(struct resource *res, u32 irq)
>> {
>> res->start = irq;
>> res->end = irq;
>> res->flags |= IORESOURCE_IRQ | IORESOURCE_DISABLED | IORESOURCE_UNSET;
>> }
>>
>> Now not much code seems to actually check the IORESOURCE_DISABLED | IORESOURCE_UNSET flags, so this might still work but it does not seem like the right thing to do.
>>
>
> Right; so it makes the resource get skipped when PNP is enumerated.
Which AFAICT means that PNP enumerated i8042-s will not have any IRQ assigned at all and this will not work.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-07 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-06 15:14 [PATCH] ACPI: resource: revert "Remove "Zen" specific match and quirks" Hans de Goede
2023-08-06 15:51 ` August Wikerfors
2023-08-06 15:58 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-08-06 17:13 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-08-06 18:20 ` Hans de Goede
2023-08-07 4:38 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-08-07 5:52 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-08-07 7:44 ` Hans de Goede
2023-08-07 11:39 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-08-07 17:06 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2023-08-07 17:08 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-08-07 15:19 ` Hans de Goede
2023-08-08 8:36 ` Hans de Goede
2023-08-08 11:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-08-08 13:31 ` Hans de Goede
2023-08-08 13:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-08-08 13:59 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4fae943f-6e72-3297-cc73-e1087e7a45bd@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=git@augustwikerfors.se \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox