Linux ACPI
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: "open list:ACPI" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	PradeepVineshReddy Kodamati <PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com>,
	CL Lin <clin41@lenovo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Only evaluate the Intel _OSC and _PDC on platforms with HWP
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 14:33:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50fcefb1-e910-435d-be0d-d0f45071d179@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0gMcR1wkOMkd5kHp8BZKdZd-HE9DrxByP9puCK-OUfGPA@mail.gmail.com>

On 6/15/2024 05:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 9:33 PM Mario Limonciello
> <mario.limonciello@amd.com> wrote:
>>
>> The UUID 4077A616-290C-47BE-9EBD-D87058713953 and _PDC methods are
>> only used on Intel platforms with HWP support.
> 
> I beg to differ.  See arch_acpi_set_proc_cap_bits() definition.

Ah I see; thanks for sharing.  I agree with you.

> 
>> Attempting to evaluate them and showing messages on hardware without
>> HWP is pointless needlessly noisy.
>>
>> Gate the code on X86_FEATURE_HWP.
> 
> Not really.

I guess this really started getting noisy in 6.6 (9527264).

Would you be open to downgrading to debug instead?

> 
>> Cc: PradeepVineshReddy (Pradeep Vinesh Reddy) Kodamati <PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com>
>> Suggested-by: CL Lin <clin41@lenovo.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
>> index 7a0dd35d62c9..84848b5e65d6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
>> @@ -597,6 +597,8 @@ static bool __init acpi_early_processor_osc(void)
>>
>>   void __init acpi_early_processor_control_setup(void)
>>   {
>> +       if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP))
>> +               return;
>>          if (acpi_early_processor_osc()) {
>>                  pr_info("_OSC evaluated successfully for all CPUs\n");
>>          } else {
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-18 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-14 19:32 [PATCH] ACPI: Only evaluate the Intel _OSC and _PDC on platforms with HWP Mario Limonciello
2024-06-15 10:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-06-18 19:33   ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2024-06-18 19:46     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50fcefb1-e910-435d-be0d-d0f45071d179@amd.com \
    --to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com \
    --cc=clin41@lenovo.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox