Linux ACPI
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <westeri@kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	"open list:GPIO ACPI SUPPORT" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:GPIO ACPI SUPPORT" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:INPUT (KEYBOARD, MOUSE, JOYSTICK,
	TOUCHSCREEN)..." <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] Input: Don't send fake button presses to wake system
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:47:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c2d7405-4c6f-49f4-ab40-0db821db6bea@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3a1e2e0c-cbb9-4e3a-aa5a-9f88e8f05bc5@kernel.org>

On 6/26/2025 1:45 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 26-Jun-25 20:42, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> On 6/26/2025 1:37 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi Mario,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 06:33:08AM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 6/26/25 3:35 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>>> Hi Mario,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 25-Jun-25 23:58, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>>>>> From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sending an input event to wake a system does wake it, but userspace picks
>>>>>> up the keypress and processes it.  This isn't the intended behavior as it
>>>>>> causes a suspended system to wake up and then potentially turn off if
>>>>>> userspace is configured to turn off on power button presses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Instead send a PM wakeup event for the PM core to handle waking the system.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cc: Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>
>>>>>> Fixes: 0f107573da417 ("Input: gpio_keys - handle the missing key press event in resume phase")
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>     drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c | 7 +------
>>>>>>     1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c
>>>>>> index 773aa5294d269..4c6876b099c43 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c
>>>>>> @@ -420,12 +420,7 @@ static irqreturn_t gpio_keys_gpio_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
>>>>>>             pm_stay_awake(bdata->input->dev.parent);
>>>>>>             if (bdata->suspended  &&
>>>>>>                 (button->type == 0 || button->type == EV_KEY)) {
>>>>>> -            /*
>>>>>> -             * Simulate wakeup key press in case the key has
>>>>>> -             * already released by the time we got interrupt
>>>>>> -             * handler to run.
>>>>>> -             */
>>>>>> -            input_report_key(bdata->input, button->code, 1);
>>>>>> +            pm_wakeup_event(bdata->input->dev.parent, 0);
>>>>>>             }
>>>>>>         }
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm, we have the same problem on many Bay Trail / Cherry Trail
>>>>> windows 8 / win10 tablets, so  this has been discussed before and e.g.
>>>>> Android userspace actually needs the button-press (evdev) event to not
>>>>> immediately go back to sleep, so a similar patch has been nacked in
>>>>> the past.
>>>>>
>>>>> At least for GNOME this has been fixed in userspace by ignoring
>>>>> power-button events the first few seconds after a resume from suspend.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The default behavior for logind is:
>>>>
>>>> HandlePowerKey=poweroff
>>>
>>> Right note poweroff not suspend, GNOME inhibits logind's power-button
>>> handling and substitutes its own handling which is done by gsd-media-keys.
>>>
>>>> Can you share more about what version of GNOME has a workaround?
>>>> This was actually GNOME (on Ubuntu 24.04) that I found this issue.
>>>
>>> See:
>>>
>>> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-settings-daemon/-/blob/main/plugins/media-keys/gsd-media-keys-manager.c?ref_type=heads#L94
>>>
>>> and the code in that file using that define.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Hans
>>>
>>
>> This is pretty ancient, it's part of GNOME 40 and later.  Ubuntu 24.04 is GNOME 46.
> 
> Right, this power-button evdev key event on resume causing an immediate
> suspend again is a pretty old problem. When I said "discussed before"
> I meant discussed quite a while ago :)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hans
> 

:)

I'm quite used to most platforms using ACPI power button which doesn't 
send a key press event during the resume sequence, so this is the first 
exposure for me to it.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-26 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-25 21:58 [PATCH v3 0/4] Fix soc-button-array debounce Mario Limonciello
2025-06-25 21:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] gpiolib: acpi: Add a helper for programming debounce Mario Limonciello
2025-06-26 14:29   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-26 16:04     ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-25 21:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] gpiolib: acpi: Program debounce when finding GPIO Mario Limonciello
2025-06-26 14:31   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-25 21:58 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] Input: Don't program hw debounce for soc_button_array devices Mario Limonciello
2025-06-26  8:27   ` Hans de Goede
2025-06-26 14:33   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-25 21:58 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] Input: Don't send fake button presses to wake system Mario Limonciello
2025-06-26  8:35   ` Hans de Goede
2025-06-26 11:33     ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-26 17:44       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-06-26 17:53         ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-26 18:07           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-06-26 18:20             ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-26 18:48               ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-06-26 18:55                 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-26 19:06                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-06-26 19:37                   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-26 18:57                 ` Hans de Goede
2025-06-26 19:14                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-06-26 19:16                     ` Hans de Goede
2025-06-26 19:18                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-06-26 19:28                         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-06-26 19:31                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-06-26 19:40                             ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-06-26 22:21                               ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-27  4:56                                 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-06-27 14:06                                   ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-27 14:14                                     ` Hans de Goede
2025-06-27 14:44                                       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-06-27 15:56                                         ` Hans de Goede
2025-06-27 16:12                                           ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-27 17:59                                             ` Hans de Goede
2025-06-27 18:47                                               ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-06-27 18:36                                           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-06-27 18:56                                             ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-27 19:18                                               ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-06-27 19:38                                                 ` Hans de Goede
2025-06-27 19:44                                                   ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-27 20:25                                                     ` Hans de Goede
2025-06-27 20:29                                                       ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-27 19:45                                                 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-27 10:36                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-06-26 19:28                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-06-26 18:37       ` Hans de Goede
2025-06-26 18:42         ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-26 18:45           ` Hans de Goede
2025-06-26 18:47             ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2025-06-26 14:37   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-26 14:35 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Fix soc-button-array debounce Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-26 15:59   ` Mario Limonciello

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9c2d7405-4c6f-49f4-ab40-0db821db6bea@kernel.org \
    --to=superm1@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hansg@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=westeri@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox