From: Michael Cree <mcree@orcon.net.nz>
To: Magnus Lindholm <linmag7@gmail.com>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
paulmck@kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel Oops on alpha with kernel version >=6.9.x
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 11:10:18 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z2ClSlwznfuk8Uwr@creeky> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+=Fv5Q=f-6y=EhZhG2XfZB0O=m+yOiv+gmtmMABVQZieKdwbQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 09:05:46AM +0100, Magnus Lindholm wrote:
> > Maybe, maybe not. Building 6.11.11 with alpha-linux-gnu-gcc-9
> > (Debian 9.3.0-22) fixed the null pointer access in the scsi
> > subsystem, and finally I have a bootable system! (Tested on ES45.)
> > But I now get a null pointer access when network driver loaded:
>
> Very interesting! Can you provide a full stack dump? interested to
> see if this is the same issue as on my system.
[ 33.144514] e100 0001:02:04.0 enP1p2s4: NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full Duplex
[ 36.878887] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000000000
[ 36.879863] CPU 0
[ 36.879863] kworker/0:1(10): Oops -1
[ 36.881817] pc = [<0000000000000000>] ra = [<0000000000000001>] ps = 0000 Not tainted
[ 36.882793] pc is at 0x0
[ 36.883770] ra is at 0x1
[ 36.884746] v0 = 0000000000000007 t0 = 0000000000000001 t1 = fffffc000091cc80
[ 36.884746] t2 = 0000000000000000 t3 = fffffc00040cca40 t4 = 0000000000000001
[ 36.884746] t5 = 0000000000000001 t6 = 0000000000000000 t7 = fffffc0004124000
[ 36.884746] s0 = fffffc000a037e00 s1 = fffffc000a037f28 s2 = fffffffffffffed8
[ 36.884746] s3 = fffffc0004020b40 s4 = fffffc0001c8d688 s5 = fffffc0004020bc0
[ 36.884746] s6 = fffffc0001c8d680
[ 36.884746] a0 = fffffc0001c5b320 a1 = fffffc000ac14200 a2 = fffffc00040ccac0
[ 36.884746] a3 = fffffc0003df36c0 a4 = fffffc000dfb3d38 a5 = ffffffffffffffff
[ 36.884746] t8 = 0000000000000000 t9 = 0000000000000000 t10= 0000000000000001
[ 36.884746] t11= 0000000000000001 pv = fffffc00018b7180 at = 0000000000000001
[ 36.884746] gp = fffffc0001cb08c8 sp = 00000000ab1ca88d
[ 36.884746] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
[ 36.896465] Trace:
[ 36.896465] [<fffffc0001049c8c>] process_scheduled_works+0xdc/0x420
[ 36.898418] [<fffffc000104a740>] worker_thread+0x0/0x3d0
[ 36.899395] [<fffffc000104a8f0>] worker_thread+0x1b0/0x3d0
[ 36.900371] [<fffffc000104a740>] worker_thread+0x0/0x3d0
[ 36.901348] [<fffffc000105705c>] kthread+0x17c/0x1c0
[ 36.902324] [<fffffc000104a740>] worker_thread+0x0/0x3d0
[ 36.903301] [<fffffc0001011198>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x18/0x20
[ 36.904277] [<fffffc0001056ee0>] kthread+0x0/0x1c0
[ 36.905254] [<fffffc0001011180>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x0/0x20
[ 36.907207] Code:
[ 36.907207] 00000000
[ 36.908184] 00000000
[ 36.909160] 00063301
[ 36.910137] 00000e90
[ 36.911113] 00001111
[ 36.912090] 0000795c
> Have you tried passing rcupdate.rcu_normal=1 as boot parameter
> to the kernel? That allowed me to bypass the network interface
> problem on my system.
Haven't as yet, but backtrace above does not go through rcu routines.
Maybe I am seeing a different issue.
Cheers,
Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-16 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CA+=Fv5R9NG+1SHU9QV9hjmavycHKpnNyerQ=Ei90G98ukRcRJA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <f1561626-fde6-41c0-9d45-87a6a7b13816@paulmck-laptop>
[not found] ` <CA+=Fv5TMZ1bckob2VZ1AaNwdU3R+5a8REKg4aZR8novx7+dj-g@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <8e365392-0e0d-4d78-bae7-69f27c8350f9@paulmck-laptop>
2024-12-04 22:22 ` Kernel Oops on alpha with kernel version >=6.9.x Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-05 15:39 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-12-05 17:02 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-06 15:39 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-06 17:05 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-12-07 12:33 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-07 12:39 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-12-07 17:33 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-07 18:38 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-12-08 9:43 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-08 21:39 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-08 23:18 ` Michael Cree
2024-12-08 23:31 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-12-09 8:11 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-12 23:23 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-09 8:05 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-16 22:10 ` Michael Cree [this message]
2024-12-17 6:23 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-18 19:33 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-18 20:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-18 21:54 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-18 22:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-19 22:38 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-19 23:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-20 0:00 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2024-12-27 10:42 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-27 11:48 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-12-27 16:30 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2024-12-31 10:43 ` Magnus Lindholm
2025-01-12 23:25 ` Magnus Lindholm
2025-01-13 0:19 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-01-13 3:08 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-01-13 5:59 ` Magnus Lindholm
2025-01-13 8:04 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-01-13 16:52 ` Magnus Lindholm
2025-01-20 13:01 ` Magnus Lindholm
2025-01-20 13:19 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-01-21 13:39 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2025-01-23 18:36 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2025-01-23 23:00 ` Magnus Lindholm
2025-01-23 23:51 ` Michael Cree
2025-01-23 23:57 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-01-24 6:06 ` Magnus Lindholm
2025-01-24 10:55 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2025-01-24 16:57 ` Magnus Lindholm
2025-01-25 15:15 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2025-01-25 17:01 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-01-25 17:43 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2025-01-25 18:25 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-01-25 18:59 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-01-25 19:48 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2025-01-25 22:06 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-01-25 23:02 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2025-01-26 14:00 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2025-01-26 19:15 ` Magnus Lindholm
2025-01-27 11:48 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2025-01-27 11:56 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-01-25 18:07 ` Magnus Lindholm
2025-01-25 15:35 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-01-25 17:09 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2025-01-24 6:54 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-11-24 21:47 Magnus Lindholm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z2ClSlwznfuk8Uwr@creeky \
--to=mcree@orcon.net.nz \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=linmag7@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox