Re: [patch 0/3] add rt_tgsigqueueinfo syscall [RESEND]

[Roland McGrath <roland-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

> > I don't see any rationale for rt_tgsigqueueinfo and rt_sigqueueinfo to
> > differ in their treatment of si_pid/si_uid (whatever that is).  It just
> > seems like common sense that they would match.
> > 
> > Oleg and/or Sukadev have some patches floating around (maybe all in -mm?)
> > that relate to setting those.
> 
> You mean having the same logic as we have in {t,tg,}kill syscalls for
> rt_sigqueueinfo as well ?

I mean just what I said: rt_tgsigqueueinfo's treatment of the siginfo_t
should match rt_sigqueueinfo's.  Make it match rt_sigqueueinfo today and
make sure that if rt_sigqueueinfo changes, then rt_tgsigqueueinfo will
change to match.

> Is there anything else which stands in the way of getting the
> rt_tgsigqueueinfo interface merged ?

I don't see any problem.  But you should at least make sure that Ulrich
likes the syscall interface for implementing pthread_sigqueue or whatever
it will be.


Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html