* Re: [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: support clone_file_range [not found] ` <20160717062427.56718-3-jaegeuk@kernel.org> @ 2016-07-19 3:47 ` Christoph Hellwig 2016-07-19 4:48 ` Jaegeuk Kim 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2016-07-19 3:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jaegeuk Kim; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-api, linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:24:27PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > This patch implements clone_file_range in f2fs. [...] > +int f2fs_clone_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, > + struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out, u64 len) > +{ > + return f2fs_clone_files(file_in, pos_in, file_out, pos_out, len); > +} > + Falling back from copy to clone should be done in the VFS. I look into implementing the fallback, and the code is trivial, but we don't seem to have any useful coverage for copy_file_range yet, so I didn't dare to add it yet. How did you test copy and clone in f2fs? And how did you handle the difference in corner cases (e.g. the lacking 0 special case in copy)? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: support clone_file_range 2016-07-19 3:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: support clone_file_range Christoph Hellwig @ 2016-07-19 4:48 ` Jaegeuk Kim 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2016-07-19 4:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-api, linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 08:47:36PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:24:27PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > This patch implements clone_file_range in f2fs. > > [...] > > > +int f2fs_clone_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, > > + struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out, u64 len) > > +{ > > + return f2fs_clone_files(file_in, pos_in, file_out, pos_out, len); > > +} > > + > > Falling back from copy to clone should be done in the VFS. I look into > implementing the fallback, and the code is trivial, but we don't seem > to have any useful coverage for copy_file_range yet, so I didn't dare > to add it yet. How did you test copy and clone in f2fs? And how did > you handle the difference in corner cases (e.g. the lacking 0 special > case in copy)? Frankly speaking, I confused the behaviors without being aware of corner cases. And thus, I dropped the patches already. Instead, I realized that what I did was moving a range of blocks from one file to another file. So, I've been testing a new ioctl, F2FS_IOC_MOVE_RANGE. In terms of coverage, I just did some unit tests only. Thanks, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-07-19 4:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20160717062427.56718-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <20160717062427.56718-3-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
2016-07-19 3:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: support clone_file_range Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-19 4:48 ` Jaegeuk Kim
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox