From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/10] signal: send_sig_all no longer needs SEND_SIG_FORCED
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 22:44:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180903204430.25473-5-ebiederm@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87musyl3fa.fsf@xmission.com>
Now that send_signal always delivers SEND_SIG_PRIV signals to a pid
namespace init it is no longer necessary to use SEND_SIG_FORCED when
calling do_send_sig_info to ensure that pid namespace inits are
signaled and possibly killed. Using SEND_SIG_PRIV is sufficient.
So use SEND_SIG_PRIV so that userspace when it receives a SIGTERM can
tell that the kernel sent the signal and not some random userspace
application.
Fixes: b82c32872db2 ("sysrq: use SEND_SIG_FORCED instead of force_sig()")
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
drivers/tty/sysrq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
index 06ed20dd01ba..ad1ee5d01b53 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static void send_sig_all(int sig)
if (is_global_init(p))
continue;
- do_send_sig_info(sig, SEND_SIG_FORCED, p, PIDTYPE_MAX);
+ do_send_sig_info(sig, SEND_SIG_PRIV, p, PIDTYPE_MAX);
}
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
}
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-03 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-03 20:41 [PATCH 00/10] Removing SEND_SIG_FORCED Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-03 20:44 ` [PATCH 01/10] signal: Always ignore SIGKILL and SIGSTOP sent to the global init Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-03 20:44 ` [PATCH 02/10] signal: Properly deliver SIGILL from uprobes Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-03 20:44 ` [PATCH 03/10] signal: Properly deliver SIGSEGV from x86 uprobes Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-03 20:44 ` [PATCH 04/10] signal: Always deliver the kernel's SIGKILL and SIGSTOP to a pid namespace init Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-03 20:44 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2018-09-03 20:44 ` [PATCH 06/10] signal: Remove the siginfo paramater from kernel_dqueue_signal Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-03 20:44 ` [PATCH 07/10] signal: Don't send siginfo to kthreads Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-03 20:44 ` [PATCH 08/10] signal: Never allocate siginfo for SIGKILL or SIGSTOP Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-03 20:44 ` [PATCH 09/10] signal: Use SEND_SIG_PRIV not SEND_SIG_FORCED with SIGKILL and SIGSTOP Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-03 20:44 ` [PATCH 10/10] signal: Remove SEND_SIG_FORCED Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-08 11:03 ` [PATCH 00/10] Removing SEND_SIG_FORCED Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180903204430.25473-5-ebiederm@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox