From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: [PATCH 09/10] signal: Use SEND_SIG_PRIV not SEND_SIG_FORCED with SIGKILL and SIGSTOP
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 22:44:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180903204430.25473-9-ebiederm@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87musyl3fa.fsf@xmission.com>
Now that siginfo is never allocated for SIGKILL and SIGSTOP there is
no difference between SEND_SIG_PRIV and SEND_SIG_FORCED for SIGKILL
and SIGSTOP. This makes SEND_SIG_FORCED unnecessary and redundant in
the presence of SIGKILL and SIGSTOP. Therefore change users of
SEND_SIG_FORCED that are sending SIGKILL or SIGSTOP to use
SEND_SIG_PRIV instead.
This removes the last users of SEND_SIG_FORCED.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
kernel/pid_namespace.c | 2 +-
kernel/ptrace.c | 4 ++--
mm/oom_kill.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/pid_namespace.c b/kernel/pid_namespace.c
index 2a2ac53d8b8b..c8d53397bbdd 100644
--- a/kernel/pid_namespace.c
+++ b/kernel/pid_namespace.c
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ void zap_pid_ns_processes(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns)
idr_for_each_entry_continue(&pid_ns->idr, pid, nr) {
task = pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
if (task && !__fatal_signal_pending(task))
- send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, task);
+ send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_PRIV, task);
}
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c
index 21fec73d45d4..45f77a1b9c97 100644
--- a/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ static int ptrace_attach(struct task_struct *task, long request,
/* SEIZE doesn't trap tracee on attach */
if (!seize)
- send_sig_info(SIGSTOP, SEND_SIG_FORCED, task);
+ send_sig_info(SIGSTOP, SEND_SIG_PRIV, task);
spin_lock(&task->sighand->siglock);
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ void exit_ptrace(struct task_struct *tracer, struct list_head *dead)
list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &tracer->ptraced, ptrace_entry) {
if (unlikely(p->ptrace & PT_EXITKILL))
- send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, p);
+ send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_PRIV, p);
if (__ptrace_detach(tracer, p))
list_add(&p->ptrace_entry, dead);
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index b5b25e4dcbbb..3bcfeaaeed87 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ static void __oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *victim)
* in order to prevent the OOM victim from depleting the memory
* reserves from the user space under its control.
*/
- do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, victim, PIDTYPE_TGID);
+ do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_PRIV, victim, PIDTYPE_TGID);
mark_oom_victim(victim);
pr_err("Killed process %d (%s) total-vm:%lukB, anon-rss:%lukB, file-rss:%lukB, shmem-rss:%lukB\n",
task_pid_nr(victim), victim->comm, K(victim->mm->total_vm),
@@ -896,7 +896,7 @@ static void __oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *victim)
*/
if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
continue;
- do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, p, PIDTYPE_TGID);
+ do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_PRIV, p, PIDTYPE_TGID);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-03 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-03 20:41 [PATCH 00/10] Removing SEND_SIG_FORCED Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-03 20:44 ` [PATCH 01/10] signal: Always ignore SIGKILL and SIGSTOP sent to the global init Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-03 20:44 ` [PATCH 02/10] signal: Properly deliver SIGILL from uprobes Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-03 20:44 ` [PATCH 03/10] signal: Properly deliver SIGSEGV from x86 uprobes Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-03 20:44 ` [PATCH 04/10] signal: Always deliver the kernel's SIGKILL and SIGSTOP to a pid namespace init Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-03 20:44 ` [PATCH 05/10] signal: send_sig_all no longer needs SEND_SIG_FORCED Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-03 20:44 ` [PATCH 06/10] signal: Remove the siginfo paramater from kernel_dqueue_signal Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-03 20:44 ` [PATCH 07/10] signal: Don't send siginfo to kthreads Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-03 20:44 ` [PATCH 08/10] signal: Never allocate siginfo for SIGKILL or SIGSTOP Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-03 20:44 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2018-09-03 20:44 ` [PATCH 10/10] signal: Remove SEND_SIG_FORCED Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-08 11:03 ` [PATCH 00/10] Removing SEND_SIG_FORCED Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180903204430.25473-9-ebiederm@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox