public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@sf-tec.de>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix compile break caused by iomap: make IOPORT/PCI mapping functions conditional
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:45:22 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1327963522.21193.92.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1539148.qFWsuy2OOI@eto>

On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 21:10 +0100, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> Am Montag 30 Januar 2012, 10:40:47 schrieb James Bottomley:
> > The problem in
> > 
> > commit fea80311a939a746533a6d7e7c3183729d6a3faf
> > Author: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
> > Date:   Sun Jul 24 11:39:14 2011 -0700
> > 
> >     iomap: make IOPORT/PCI mapping functions conditional
> > 
> > 
> > is that if your architecture supplies pci_iomap/pci_iounmap, it expects
> > always to supply them.  Adding empty body defitions in the !CONFIG_PCI
> > case, which is what this patch does, breaks the parisc compile because
> > the functions become doubly defined.  It took us a while to spot this,
> > because we don't actually build !CONFIG_PCI very often (only if someone
> > is brave enough to test the snake/asp machines).
> > 
> > Since the note in the commit log says this is to fix a
> > CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP issue (which it does because CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP
> > supplies pci_iounmap only if CONFIG_PCI is set), there should actually
> > have been a condition upon this.  This should make sure no other
> > architecture's !CONFIG_PCI compile breaks in the same way as parisc.
> > 
> > The fix had to be updated to take account of the GENERIC_PCI_IOMAP
> > separation.
> 
> So this means we end up still building the PA-RISC PCI code even if the config 
> says no PCI. That doesn't really sound consistent to me. I really would have 
> expected that we do not build any non-void PCI code then.

The first object is to fix the build breakage which likely affects more
than just parisc. Having a non-stub for the pci functions is just a few
spurious bytes in a kernel that's megabytes big (and it's what we were
doing previously).

James



  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-01-30 22:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-30 16:40 [PATCH] fix compile break caused by iomap: make IOPORT/PCI mapping functions conditional James Bottomley
2012-01-30 20:10 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2012-01-30 20:10   ` Rolf Eike Beer
2012-01-30 22:45   ` James Bottomley [this message]
2012-01-30 22:45     ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1327963522.21193.92.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=eike-kernel@sf-tec.de \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox