From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@sf-tec.de>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix compile break caused by iomap: make IOPORT/PCI mapping functions conditional
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:45:22 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1327963522.21193.92.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1539148.qFWsuy2OOI@eto>
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 21:10 +0100, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> Am Montag 30 Januar 2012, 10:40:47 schrieb James Bottomley:
> > The problem in
> >
> > commit fea80311a939a746533a6d7e7c3183729d6a3faf
> > Author: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
> > Date: Sun Jul 24 11:39:14 2011 -0700
> >
> > iomap: make IOPORT/PCI mapping functions conditional
> >
> >
> > is that if your architecture supplies pci_iomap/pci_iounmap, it expects
> > always to supply them. Adding empty body defitions in the !CONFIG_PCI
> > case, which is what this patch does, breaks the parisc compile because
> > the functions become doubly defined. It took us a while to spot this,
> > because we don't actually build !CONFIG_PCI very often (only if someone
> > is brave enough to test the snake/asp machines).
> >
> > Since the note in the commit log says this is to fix a
> > CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP issue (which it does because CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP
> > supplies pci_iounmap only if CONFIG_PCI is set), there should actually
> > have been a condition upon this. This should make sure no other
> > architecture's !CONFIG_PCI compile breaks in the same way as parisc.
> >
> > The fix had to be updated to take account of the GENERIC_PCI_IOMAP
> > separation.
>
> So this means we end up still building the PA-RISC PCI code even if the config
> says no PCI. That doesn't really sound consistent to me. I really would have
> expected that we do not build any non-void PCI code then.
The first object is to fix the build breakage which likely affects more
than just parisc. Having a non-stub for the pci functions is just a few
spurious bytes in a kernel that's megabytes big (and it's what we were
doing previously).
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-30 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-30 16:40 [PATCH] fix compile break caused by iomap: make IOPORT/PCI mapping functions conditional James Bottomley
2012-01-30 20:10 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2012-01-30 20:10 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2012-01-30 22:45 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2012-01-30 22:45 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1327963522.21193.92.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=eike-kernel@sf-tec.de \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox