public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@sf-tec.de>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix compile break caused by iomap: make IOPORT/PCI mapping functions conditional
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:10:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1539148.qFWsuy2OOI@eto> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1327941647.21193.53.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1548 bytes --]

Am Montag 30 Januar 2012, 10:40:47 schrieb James Bottomley:
> The problem in
> 
> commit fea80311a939a746533a6d7e7c3183729d6a3faf
> Author: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
> Date:   Sun Jul 24 11:39:14 2011 -0700
> 
>     iomap: make IOPORT/PCI mapping functions conditional
> 
> 
> is that if your architecture supplies pci_iomap/pci_iounmap, it expects
> always to supply them.  Adding empty body defitions in the !CONFIG_PCI
> case, which is what this patch does, breaks the parisc compile because
> the functions become doubly defined.  It took us a while to spot this,
> because we don't actually build !CONFIG_PCI very often (only if someone
> is brave enough to test the snake/asp machines).
> 
> Since the note in the commit log says this is to fix a
> CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP issue (which it does because CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP
> supplies pci_iounmap only if CONFIG_PCI is set), there should actually
> have been a condition upon this.  This should make sure no other
> architecture's !CONFIG_PCI compile breaks in the same way as parisc.
> 
> The fix had to be updated to take account of the GENERIC_PCI_IOMAP
> separation.

So this means we end up still building the PA-RISC PCI code even if the config 
says no PCI. That doesn't really sound consistent to me. I really would have 
expected that we do not build any non-void PCI code then.

> Reported-by: Rolf Eike Beer <eike@sf-mail.de>

I used the wrong email account when sending out the last patch where you took 
that from, please change that to the address used in this mail.

Eike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-30 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-30 16:40 [PATCH] fix compile break caused by iomap: make IOPORT/PCI mapping functions conditional James Bottomley
2012-01-30 20:10 ` Rolf Eike Beer [this message]
2012-01-30 20:10   ` Rolf Eike Beer
2012-01-30 22:45   ` James Bottomley
2012-01-30 22:45     ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1539148.qFWsuy2OOI@eto \
    --to=eike-kernel@sf-tec.de \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox