Generic Linux architectural discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [patch 4/8] irq code: Add coherence test for PREEMPT_ACTIVE
       [not found] <20050527003843.433BA1AEE88@zion.home.lan>
@ 2005-05-27  1:06 ` Blaisorblade
  2005-05-27  3:31   ` Paul Mundt
  2005-05-27 13:33   ` David Howells
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Blaisorblade @ 2005-05-27  1:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, linux-kernel, linux-arch
  Cc: user-mode-linux-devel, linuxsh-shmedia-dev, linux-sh, dhowells

On Friday 27 May 2005 02:38, blaisorblade@yahoo.it wrote:
> After porting this fixlet to UML:
>
> http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/cset@41791ab52lfMuF2i3V-eTIGRBbDYKQ
>
> , I've also added a warning which should refuse compilation with insane
> values for PREEMPT_ACTIVE... maybe we should simply move PREEMPT_ACTIVE out
> of architectures using GENERIC_IRQS.
Ok, a grep shows that possible culprits (i.e. giving success to
grep GENERIC_HARDIRQS arch/*/Kconfig, and using 0x4000000 as PREEMPT_ACTIVE, 
as given by grep PREEMPT_ACTIVE include/asm-*/thread_info.h) are (at a first 
glance): frv, sh, sh64.

After a bit of checking, I also verified if they had overriden the value of 
HARDIRQ_BITS. Which they haven't (it seems it's defined exactly where 
CONFIG_HARDIRQS is not used, i.e. nobody is using the ability to override it 
currently).

This was not a very deep investigation, however, so feel free to verify this 
better.
-- 
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso"
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade

	

	
		
___________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB 
http://mail.yahoo.it

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [patch 4/8] irq code: Add coherence test for PREEMPT_ACTIVE
  2005-05-27  1:06 ` [patch 4/8] irq code: Add coherence test for PREEMPT_ACTIVE Blaisorblade
@ 2005-05-27  3:31   ` Paul Mundt
  2005-05-28 11:21     ` Blaisorblade
  2005-05-27 13:33   ` David Howells
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paul Mundt @ 2005-05-27  3:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Blaisorblade
  Cc: akpm, linux-kernel, linux-arch, user-mode-linux-devel,
	linuxsh-shmedia-dev, linux-sh, dhowells

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2056 bytes --]

On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 03:06:09AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Friday 27 May 2005 02:38, blaisorblade@yahoo.it wrote:
> > After porting this fixlet to UML:
> >
> > http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/cset@41791ab52lfMuF2i3V-eTIGRBbDYKQ
> >
> > , I've also added a warning which should refuse compilation with insane
> > values for PREEMPT_ACTIVE... maybe we should simply move PREEMPT_ACTIVE out
> > of architectures using GENERIC_IRQS.
> Ok, a grep shows that possible culprits (i.e. giving success to
> grep GENERIC_HARDIRQS arch/*/Kconfig, and using 0x4000000 as PREEMPT_ACTIVE, 
> as given by grep PREEMPT_ACTIVE include/asm-*/thread_info.h) are (at a first 
> glance): frv, sh, sh64.
> 
Yeah, that's bogus for sh and sh64 anyways, this should do it.

It would be nice to move PRREMPT_ACTIVE so it isn't per-arch anymore,
there's not many users that use a different value (at least for the ones
using generic hardirqs, ia64 seems to be the only one?).

Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>

include/asm-sh/thread_info.h: needs update
include/asm-sh64/thread_info.h: needs update
Index: include/asm-sh/thread_info.h
===================================================================
--- 3ac9a34948049bff79a2b2ce49c0a3c84e35a748/include/asm-sh/thread_info.h  (mode:100644)
+++ uncommitted/include/asm-sh/thread_info.h  (mode:100644)
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
 
 #endif
 
-#define PREEMPT_ACTIVE		0x4000000
+#define PREEMPT_ACTIVE		0x10000000
 
 /*
  * macros/functions for gaining access to the thread information structure
Index: include/asm-sh64/thread_info.h
===================================================================
--- 3ac9a34948049bff79a2b2ce49c0a3c84e35a748/include/asm-sh64/thread_info.h  (mode:100644)
+++ uncommitted/include/asm-sh64/thread_info.h  (mode:100644)
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
 
 #define THREAD_SIZE  8192
 
-#define PREEMPT_ACTIVE		0x4000000
+#define PREEMPT_ACTIVE		0x10000000
 
 /* thread information flags */
 #define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE	0	/* syscall trace active */

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [patch 4/8] irq code: Add coherence test for PREEMPT_ACTIVE
  2005-05-27  1:06 ` [patch 4/8] irq code: Add coherence test for PREEMPT_ACTIVE Blaisorblade
  2005-05-27  3:31   ` Paul Mundt
@ 2005-05-27 13:33   ` David Howells
  2005-05-28 11:19     ` Blaisorblade
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2005-05-27 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Blaisorblade
  Cc: akpm, linux-kernel, linux-arch, user-mode-linux-devel,
	linuxsh-shmedia-dev, linux-sh

Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote:

> Ok, a grep shows that possible culprits (i.e. giving success to
> grep GENERIC_HARDIRQS arch/*/Kconfig, and using 0x4000000 as PREEMPT_ACTIVE, 
> as given by grep PREEMPT_ACTIVE include/asm-*/thread_info.h) are (at a first 
> glance): frv, sh, sh64.

For FRV that's simply because it got copied from the parent arch along with
other stuff. Feel free to move it... Do you want me to make you up a patch to
do so?

David

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [patch 4/8] irq code: Add coherence test for PREEMPT_ACTIVE
  2005-05-27 13:33   ` David Howells
@ 2005-05-28 11:19     ` Blaisorblade
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Blaisorblade @ 2005-05-28 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Howells
  Cc: akpm, linux-kernel, linux-arch, user-mode-linux-devel,
	linuxsh-shmedia-dev, linux-sh

On Friday 27 May 2005 15:33, David Howells wrote:
> Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote:
> > Ok, a grep shows that possible culprits (i.e. giving success to
> > grep GENERIC_HARDIRQS arch/*/Kconfig, and using 0x4000000 as
> > PREEMPT_ACTIVE, as given by grep PREEMPT_ACTIVE
> > include/asm-*/thread_info.h) are (at a first glance): frv, sh, sh64.
>
> For FRV that's simply because it got copied from the parent arch along with
> other stuff. Feel free to move it... Do you want me to make you up a patch
> to do so?
Sorry but fix that yourself, otherwise you get a chance I'll forget since I'm 
quite busy.

Thanks a lot for attention.
-- 
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso"
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade

		
___________________________________ 
Yahoo! Messenger: chiamate gratuite in tutto il mondo 
http://it.beta.messenger.yahoo.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [patch 4/8] irq code: Add coherence test for PREEMPT_ACTIVE
  2005-05-27  3:31   ` Paul Mundt
@ 2005-05-28 11:21     ` Blaisorblade
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Blaisorblade @ 2005-05-28 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Mundt
  Cc: akpm, linux-kernel, linux-arch, user-mode-linux-devel,
	linuxsh-shmedia-dev, linux-sh, dhowells

On Friday 27 May 2005 05:31, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 03:06:09AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Friday 27 May 2005 02:38, blaisorblade@yahoo.it wrote:

> > Ok, a grep shows that possible culprits (i.e. giving success to
> > grep GENERIC_HARDIRQS arch/*/Kconfig, and using 0x4000000 as
> > PREEMPT_ACTIVE, as given by grep PREEMPT_ACTIVE
> > include/asm-*/thread_info.h) are (at a first glance): frv, sh, sh64.

> Yeah, that's bogus for sh and sh64 anyways, this should do it.

> It would be nice to move PRREMPT_ACTIVE so it isn't per-arch anymore,
> there's not many users that use a different value (at least for the ones
> using generic hardirqs, ia64 seems to be the only one?).

Then in the generic headers
#ifndef PREEMPT_ACTIVE
#define PREEMPT_ACTIVE <the right value>
#else
<do the above coherence test>
#endif
Would be ok, right?
-- 
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso"
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade

	

	
		
___________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB 
http://mail.yahoo.it

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-28 11:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20050527003843.433BA1AEE88@zion.home.lan>
2005-05-27  1:06 ` [patch 4/8] irq code: Add coherence test for PREEMPT_ACTIVE Blaisorblade
2005-05-27  3:31   ` Paul Mundt
2005-05-28 11:21     ` Blaisorblade
2005-05-27 13:33   ` David Howells
2005-05-28 11:19     ` Blaisorblade

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox