* [patch 0/3] Directed yield take 3.
@ 2006-09-19 11:19 Martin Schwidefsky
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Martin Schwidefsky @ 2006-09-19 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arch, linux-kernel, akpm; +Cc: mingo, paulus
On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 10:53 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > nobody has complained about my spinlock yield patches.
>
> Complain.
>
> I had to hunt around a bit to discover that this functionality has
> something to do with "giving up the timeslice of a virtual cpu in favour of
> a specific cpu". And also that it is expected to be of some
> briefly-alluded-to benefit on powerpc.
>
> So... Could you please flesh out the description/rationale rather a lot
> and cc linux-kernel on the patches?
Ok here we go,
added some more beef to the description of patch #1 and replaced the
description of patch #2. Good enough now?
--
blue skies,
Martin.
Martin Schwidefsky
Linux for zSeries Development & Services
IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2006-09-19 11:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-09-19 11:19 [patch 0/3] Directed yield take 3 Martin Schwidefsky
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox