From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>,
Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>arcml <l>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bug.h: Work around GCC PR82365 in BUG()
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 10:52:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27bfdc23-1774-cf07-dab4-ab253a41d2f7@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a25RgC0qPCrGfutSnLHr77NqK74dW2g0m7fcMnm5Ou8yg@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/20/2017 01:01 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Vineet Gupta
> <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> wrote:
>> On 12/19/2017 12:13 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I suppose BUG() implies "dead end" like semantics - which ARC was lacking
>>>> before ?
>>>
>>> Correct. Using __builtin_trap() here avoids the 'control reaches end of
>>> non-void
>>> function' warnings, but then makes us run into the stack size problem that
>>> I work around with the barrier_before_unreachable().
>>>
>>> It would be good if you could give this a quick test to see if you get
>>> sensible
>>> output from the __builtin_trap();
>>
>>
>> It does, added a BUG() arbit, hits an abort()
>>
>> ...
>> ISA Extn : atomic ll64 unalign (not used)
>> : mpy[opt 9] div_rem norm barrel-shift swap minmax swape
>> BPU : partial match, cache:2048, Predict Table:16384
>> BUG: failure at ../arch/arc/mm/tlb.c:827/arc_mmu_init()!
>>
>>
>> Tested-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
>
> I meant whether it prints the right registers and stack trace, but I
> assume you tested that and just did not list it above.
Sorry, I didn't realize we are missing the stack trace now which you removed from
the patch - why ? Did u intend to reduce inline generated code for the stack dump
calls - which sounds like a great idea. But it would only work for the synchronous
abort() but not when builtin translates to actual trap inducing instruction.
> Hmm, so with the new definition of abort(),
>
> +__weak void abort(void)
> +{
> + BUG();
> +
> + /* if that doesn't kill us, halt */
> + panic("Oops failed to kill thread");
> +}
>
> won't that run into an endless recursion? Or do you then override abort()
> for ARC?
Indeed so. I didn't run into this in my testing as my for-curr has an ARC specific
version (predating Sudip's generic version- because of build failures in our
internal regression jobs etc). That version only calls panic.
abort() is only likely to be called due to __builtin_trap() for arches where gcc
doesn't have a target specific defn of it. And thus adding the call from BUG()
will cause the recursion as you found out with Sudip's generic version and thus
needs a fixup.
Thx,
-Vineet
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>,
Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
arcml <linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bug.h: Work around GCC PR82365 in BUG()
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 10:52:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27bfdc23-1774-cf07-dab4-ab253a41d2f7@synopsys.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20171220185227.iWwkeGlH_ShNM23_XZzWt2l8lms6QvhEy6pnZB6Hrj8@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a25RgC0qPCrGfutSnLHr77NqK74dW2g0m7fcMnm5Ou8yg@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/20/2017 01:01 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Vineet Gupta
> <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> wrote:
>> On 12/19/2017 12:13 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I suppose BUG() implies "dead end" like semantics - which ARC was lacking
>>>> before ?
>>>
>>> Correct. Using __builtin_trap() here avoids the 'control reaches end of
>>> non-void
>>> function' warnings, but then makes us run into the stack size problem that
>>> I work around with the barrier_before_unreachable().
>>>
>>> It would be good if you could give this a quick test to see if you get
>>> sensible
>>> output from the __builtin_trap();
>>
>>
>> It does, added a BUG() arbit, hits an abort()
>>
>> ...
>> ISA Extn : atomic ll64 unalign (not used)
>> : mpy[opt 9] div_rem norm barrel-shift swap minmax swape
>> BPU : partial match, cache:2048, Predict Table:16384
>> BUG: failure at ../arch/arc/mm/tlb.c:827/arc_mmu_init()!
>>
>>
>> Tested-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
>
> I meant whether it prints the right registers and stack trace, but I
> assume you tested that and just did not list it above.
Sorry, I didn't realize we are missing the stack trace now which you removed from
the patch - why ? Did u intend to reduce inline generated code for the stack dump
calls - which sounds like a great idea. But it would only work for the synchronous
abort() but not when builtin translates to actual trap inducing instruction.
> Hmm, so with the new definition of abort(),
>
> +__weak void abort(void)
> +{
> + BUG();
> +
> + /* if that doesn't kill us, halt */
> + panic("Oops failed to kill thread");
> +}
>
> won't that run into an endless recursion? Or do you then override abort()
> for ARC?
Indeed so. I didn't run into this in my testing as my for-curr has an ARC specific
version (predating Sudip's generic version- because of build failures in our
internal regression jobs etc). That version only calls panic.
abort() is only likely to be called due to __builtin_trap() for arches where gcc
doesn't have a target specific defn of it. And thus adding the call from BUG()
will cause the recursion as you found out with Sudip's generic version and thus
needs a fixup.
Thx,
-Vineet
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-20 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-19 11:39 [PATCH] bug.h: Work around GCC PR82365 in BUG() Arnd Bergmann
2017-12-19 11:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-12-19 11:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-12-19 11:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-12-19 16:57 ` Vineet Gupta
2017-12-19 16:57 ` Vineet Gupta
2017-12-19 20:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-12-19 20:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-12-19 22:38 ` Vineet Gupta
2017-12-19 22:38 ` Vineet Gupta
2017-12-20 9:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-12-20 9:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-12-20 18:52 ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2017-12-20 18:52 ` Vineet Gupta
2017-12-20 20:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-12-20 20:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-12-20 20:29 ` Vineet Gupta
2017-12-20 20:29 ` Vineet Gupta
2018-02-08 0:01 ` Andrew Morton
2018-02-08 0:01 ` Andrew Morton
2018-02-08 0:51 ` Vineet Gupta
2018-02-08 0:51 ` Vineet Gupta
2018-02-08 1:20 ` Vineet Gupta
2018-02-08 1:20 ` Vineet Gupta
2018-02-21 21:23 ` Vineet Gupta
2018-02-21 21:23 ` Vineet Gupta
2018-04-10 22:48 ` James Hogan
2018-04-10 22:48 ` James Hogan
2018-04-11 7:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-04-11 7:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-04-11 9:54 ` James Hogan
2018-04-11 9:54 ` James Hogan
2018-04-11 10:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-04-11 10:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-04-11 10:19 ` James Hogan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27bfdc23-1774-cf07-dab4-ab253a41d2f7@synopsys.com \
--to=vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=jesper.nilsson@axis.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sparse@chrisli.org \
--cc=starvik@axis.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox