From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 8/8] dax: Fix incorrect list of dcache aliasing architectures
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:14:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <654c13fd-8c54-48e7-921b-1503e37f1455@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65b9babf6b3de_5a9dd294de@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch>
On 2024-01-30 22:13, Dan Williams wrote:
> Dave Chinner wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:52:55AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>>> commit d92576f1167c ("dax: does not work correctly with virtual aliasing caches")
>>> prevents DAX from building on architectures with virtually aliased
>>> dcache with:
>>>
>>> depends on !(ARM || MIPS || SPARC)
>>>
>>> This check is too broad (e.g. recent ARMv7 don't have virtually aliased
>>> dcaches), and also misses many other architectures with virtually
>>> aliased dcache.
>>>
>>> This is a regression introduced in the v5.13 Linux kernel where the
>>> dax mount option is removed for 32-bit ARMv7 boards which have no dcache
>>> aliasing, and therefore should work fine with FS_DAX.
>>>
>>> This was turned into the following implementation of dax_is_supported()
>>> by a preparatory change:
>>>
>>> return !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM) &&
>>> !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MIPS) &&
>>> !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPARC);
>>>
>>> Use dcache_is_aliasing() instead to figure out whether the environment
>>> has aliasing dcaches.
>>>
>>> Fixes: d92576f1167c ("dax: does not work correctly with virtual aliasing caches")
>>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
>>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>>> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
>>> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
>>> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
>>> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
>>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
>>> Cc: nvdimm@lists.linux.dev
>>> Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
>>> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/dax.h | 5 ++---
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/dax.h b/include/linux/dax.h
>>> index cfc8cd4a3eae..f59e604662e4 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/dax.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/dax.h
>>> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>>> #include <linux/fs.h>
>>> #include <linux/mm.h>
>>> #include <linux/radix-tree.h>
>>> +#include <linux/cacheinfo.h>
>>>
>>> typedef unsigned long dax_entry_t;
>>>
>>> @@ -80,9 +81,7 @@ static inline bool daxdev_mapping_supported(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> }
>>> static inline bool dax_is_supported(void)
>>> {
>>> - return !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM) &&
>>> - !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MIPS) &&
>>> - !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPARC);
>>> + return !dcache_is_aliasing();
>>
>> Yeah, if this is just a one liner should go into
>> fs_dax_get_by_bdev(), similar to the blk_queue_dax() check at the
>> start of the function.
>>
>> I also noticed that device mapper uses fs_dax_get_by_bdev() to
>> determine if it can support DAX, but this patch set does not address
>> that case. Hence it really seems to me like fs_dax_get_by_bdev() is
>> the right place to put this check.
>
> Oh, good catch. Yes, I agree this can definitely be pushed down, but
> then I think it should be pushed down all the way to make alloc_dax()
> fail. That will need some additional fixups like:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
> index 8dcabf84d866..a35e60e62440 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
> @@ -2126,12 +2126,12 @@ static struct mapped_device *alloc_dev(int minor)
> md->dax_dev = alloc_dax(md, &dm_dax_ops);
> if (IS_ERR(md->dax_dev)) {
> md->dax_dev = NULL;
> - goto bad;
> + } else {
> + set_dax_nocache(md->dax_dev);
> + set_dax_nomc(md->dax_dev);
> + if (dax_add_host(md->dax_dev, md->disk))
> + goto bad;
> }
> - set_dax_nocache(md->dax_dev);
> - set_dax_nomc(md->dax_dev);
> - if (dax_add_host(md->dax_dev, md->disk))
> - goto bad;
> }
>
> format_dev_t(md->name, MKDEV(_major, minor));
>
> ...to make it not fatal to fail to register the dax_dev.
I've had a quick look at other users of alloc_dax() and
alloc_dax_region(), and so far I figure that all of those
really want to bail out on alloc_dax failure. Is dm.c the
only special-case we need to fix to make it non-fatal ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-31 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-30 16:52 [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] Introduce dcache_is_aliasing() to fix DAX regression Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-01-30 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] dax: Introduce dax_is_supported() Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-01-31 2:38 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-30 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] erofs: Use dax_is_supported() Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-01-30 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] ext2: " Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-01-30 21:40 ` Jan Kara
2024-01-30 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] ext4: " Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-01-30 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] fuse: " Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-01-30 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/8] xfs: " Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-01-30 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] Introduce dcache_is_aliasing() across all architectures Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-01-31 2:48 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-31 14:58 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-01-31 20:42 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-30 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 8/8] dax: Fix incorrect list of dcache aliasing architectures Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-01-31 2:54 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-31 3:13 ` Dan Williams
2024-01-31 15:14 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=654c13fd-8c54-48e7-921b-1503e37f1455@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox