Generic Linux architectural discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@vger.kernel.org,
	Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>,
	Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@googlemail.com>,
	Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: slub: fix panic with DISCONTIGMEM
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:48:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinyvO78OnKZGW3jB_N6uao0tppnAw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303248576.11237.23.camel@mulgrave.site>

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 23:29, James Bottomley
<James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
> Slub makes assumptions about page_to_nid() which are violated by
> DISCONTIGMEM and !NUMA.  This violation results in a panic because
> page_to_nid() can be non-zero for pages in the discontiguous ranges and
> this leads to a null return by get_node().  The assertion by the
> maintainer is that DISCONTIGMEM should only be allowed when NUMA is also
> defined.  However, at least six architectures: alpha, ia64, m32r, m68k,
> mips, parisc violate this.  The panic is a regression against slab, so
> just mark slub broken in the problem configuration to prevent users
> reporting these panics.

How does the problem manifest itself? We're having a problem on m68k, which
seems to go away when switching from SLUB to SLAB, or when reverting a commit
in [2] (probably this was never reported upstream).

References:
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org/msg02812.html
[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-m68k/msg03401.html

> Cc: stable@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index 56240e7..a7ad8fb 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -1226,6 +1226,7 @@ config SLAB
>          per cpu and per node queues.
>
>  config SLUB
> +       depends on BROKEN || NUMA || !DISCONTIGMEM
>        bool "SLUB (Unqueued Allocator)"
>        help
>           SLUB is a slab allocator that minimizes cache line usage

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@vger.kernel.org,
	Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>,
	Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@googlemail.com>,
	Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: slub: fix panic with DISCONTIGMEM
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:48:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinyvO78OnKZGW3jB_N6uao0tppnAw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20110420074843.XgzW5_ea7rMbpfc_5znNetLDwJ6J1R4EN3DRv1pMuQY@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303248576.11237.23.camel@mulgrave.site>

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 23:29, James Bottomley
<James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
> Slub makes assumptions about page_to_nid() which are violated by
> DISCONTIGMEM and !NUMA.  This violation results in a panic because
> page_to_nid() can be non-zero for pages in the discontiguous ranges and
> this leads to a null return by get_node().  The assertion by the
> maintainer is that DISCONTIGMEM should only be allowed when NUMA is also
> defined.  However, at least six architectures: alpha, ia64, m32r, m68k,
> mips, parisc violate this.  The panic is a regression against slab, so
> just mark slub broken in the problem configuration to prevent users
> reporting these panics.

How does the problem manifest itself? We're having a problem on m68k, which
seems to go away when switching from SLUB to SLAB, or when reverting a commit
in [2] (probably this was never reported upstream).

References:
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org/msg02812.html
[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-m68k/msg03401.html

> Cc: stable@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index 56240e7..a7ad8fb 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -1226,6 +1226,7 @@ config SLAB
>          per cpu and per node queues.
>
>  config SLUB
> +       depends on BROKEN || NUMA || !DISCONTIGMEM
>        bool "SLUB (Unqueued Allocator)"
>        help
>           SLUB is a slab allocator that minimizes cache line usage

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-04-20  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-19 21:29 slub: fix panic with DISCONTIGMEM James Bottomley
2011-04-19 21:29 ` James Bottomley
2011-04-19 21:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-19 21:52   ` James Bottomley
2011-04-19 21:52     ` James Bottomley
2011-04-19 22:04     ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-19 22:04       ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-20  7:48 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2011-04-20  7:48   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-04-20 13:54   ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-23  1:27   ` Michael Schmitz
2011-04-23  1:27     ` Michael Schmitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BANLkTinyvO78OnKZGW3jB_N6uao0tppnAw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schmitzmic@googlemail.com \
    --cc=tg@mirbsd.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox