Re: [PATCH 1/3] irqchip/gic-v5: Move LPI alloc/free into LPI domain

[Sascha Bischoff <Sascha.Bischoff@arm.com>]

On Tue, 2026-05-05 at 22:02 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30 2026 at 15:34, Sascha Bischoff wrote:
> 
> > Rather than relying on the domains built on top of GICv5's LPI
> > domain
> > to manage LPI allocations and frees, move that into the LPI domain
> > itself. This, rightly, ensures that domains other than the LPI
> > itself
> > have no knowledge of LPI allocations themselves. This not only
> > cleans
> > up the LPI domain itself, but also the IPI and ITS MSI domains
> > which
> > build upon it.
> > 
> > While we're at it, drop the helpers wrapping the helpers -
> > gicv5_alloc_lpi() and gicv5_free_lpi() - and directly use
> > alloc_lpi()
> > and release_lpi() instead.
> 
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-tip.html#changelog

Have re-worked this commit message to be more in line with the expected
style.

> 
> >  
> > +static void gicv5_irq_lpi_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain,
> > unsigned int virq,
> > +				      unsigned int nr_irqs)
> > +{
> > +	struct irq_data *d;
> > +
> > +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(nr_irqs != 1))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	d = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq);
> > +
> > +
> 
> Stray extra newline.

Gone now.

> 
> > +	release_lpi(d->hwirq);
> > +
> > +	irq_set_handler(virq, NULL);
> > +	irq_domain_reset_irq_data(d);
> > +}
> 
> Otherwise this looks good.

Thanks,
Sascha