Re: [PATCH] arm64/sysreg: Fix typo in Enum element regex

From: "Alejandro T." <atafalla@dnyon.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/sysreg: Fix typo in Enum element regex
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 14:50:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <13240249.uLZWGnKmhe@alexbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YqMo1gGVgWQDBQjJ@sirena.org.uk>

On viernes, 10 de junio de 2022 13:19:50 (CEST) Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 10:15:04AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 10:42:18PM +0200, Alejandro Tafalla wrote:
> > > In the awk script, there was a typo with the comparison operator when
> > > checking if the matched pattern is inside an Enum block.
> > > This prevented the generation of the whole sysreg-defs.h header.
> > > 
> > > -/0b[01]+/ && block = "Enum" {
> > > +/0b[01]+/ && block == "Enum" {
> > 
> > This makes sense but I'm surprised that we haven't noticed it until now
> > (maybe some awk versions treat it as a relational operator).
> 
> What Catlain said - if we weren't generating the full header contents
> I'd expect things to fail to build normally, but it's entirely possible
> this is just happening to work with some implementations and the patch
> is clearly correct.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Hi Mark, thanks for your review. 

Indeed, I'm building the kernel in Alpine, which uses Busybox instead of gawk.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel