* [PATCHv2] of: Check for phys_addr_t overflows in early_init_dt_add_memory_arch
@ 2014-06-20 3:13 Laura Abbott
2014-06-20 3:33 ` Nicolas Pitre
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Laura Abbott @ 2014-06-20 3:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The common early_init_dt_add_memory_arch takes the base and size
of a memory region as u64 types. The function never checks if
the base and size can actually fit in a phys_addr_t which may
be smaller than 64-bits. This may result in incorrect memory
being passed to memblock_add if the memory falls outside the
range of phys_addr_t. Add range checks for the base and size if
phys_addr_t is smaller than u64.
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
---
v2: Switched to sizeof(phys_addr_t) < sizeof(u64) instead of macros.
Sending to right e-mails/mailing lists this time.
drivers/of/fdt.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
index c4cddf0..b777d8f 100644
--- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
+++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
@@ -880,6 +880,21 @@ void __init __weak early_init_dt_add_memory_arch(u64 base, u64 size)
const u64 phys_offset = __pa(PAGE_OFFSET);
base &= PAGE_MASK;
size &= PAGE_MASK;
+
+ if (sizeof(phys_addr_t) < sizeof(u64)) {
+ if (base > ULONG_MAX) {
+ pr_warning("Ignoring memory block 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
+ base, base + size);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (base + size > ULONG_MAX) {
+ pr_warning("Ignoring memory range 0x%lx - 0x%llx\n",
+ ULONG_MAX, base + size);
+ size = ULONG_MAX - base;
+ }
+ }
+
if (base + size < phys_offset) {
pr_warning("Ignoring memory block 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
base, base + size);
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [PATCHv2] of: Check for phys_addr_t overflows in early_init_dt_add_memory_arch
2014-06-20 3:13 [PATCHv2] of: Check for phys_addr_t overflows in early_init_dt_add_memory_arch Laura Abbott
@ 2014-06-20 3:33 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-06-24 11:19 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Pitre @ 2014-06-20 3:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Laura Abbott wrote:
> The common early_init_dt_add_memory_arch takes the base and size
> of a memory region as u64 types. The function never checks if
> the base and size can actually fit in a phys_addr_t which may
> be smaller than 64-bits. This may result in incorrect memory
> being passed to memblock_add if the memory falls outside the
> range of phys_addr_t. Add range checks for the base and size if
> phys_addr_t is smaller than u64.
>
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
> ---
> v2: Switched to sizeof(phys_addr_t) < sizeof(u64) instead of macros.
> Sending to right e-mails/mailing lists this time.
>
> drivers/of/fdt.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> index c4cddf0..b777d8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> @@ -880,6 +880,21 @@ void __init __weak early_init_dt_add_memory_arch(u64 base, u64 size)
> const u64 phys_offset = __pa(PAGE_OFFSET);
> base &= PAGE_MASK;
> size &= PAGE_MASK;
> +
> + if (sizeof(phys_addr_t) < sizeof(u64)) {
> + if (base > ULONG_MAX) {
> + pr_warning("Ignoring memory block 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
> + base, base + size);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (base + size > ULONG_MAX) {
> + pr_warning("Ignoring memory range 0x%lx - 0x%llx\n",
> + ULONG_MAX, base + size);
> + size = ULONG_MAX - base;
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (base + size < phys_offset) {
> pr_warning("Ignoring memory block 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
> base, base + size);
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> hosted by The Linux Foundation
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [PATCHv2] of: Check for phys_addr_t overflows in early_init_dt_add_memory_arch
2014-06-20 3:33 ` Nicolas Pitre
@ 2014-06-24 11:19 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2014-06-24 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 23:33:27 -0400 (EDT), Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Laura Abbott wrote:
>
> > The common early_init_dt_add_memory_arch takes the base and size
> > of a memory region as u64 types. The function never checks if
> > the base and size can actually fit in a phys_addr_t which may
> > be smaller than 64-bits. This may result in incorrect memory
> > being passed to memblock_add if the memory falls outside the
> > range of phys_addr_t. Add range checks for the base and size if
> > phys_addr_t is smaller than u64.
> >
> > Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> > Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Applied, thanks.
g.
>
> > ---
> > v2: Switched to sizeof(phys_addr_t) < sizeof(u64) instead of macros.
> > Sending to right e-mails/mailing lists this time.
> >
> > drivers/of/fdt.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> > index c4cddf0..b777d8f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> > @@ -880,6 +880,21 @@ void __init __weak early_init_dt_add_memory_arch(u64 base, u64 size)
> > const u64 phys_offset = __pa(PAGE_OFFSET);
> > base &= PAGE_MASK;
> > size &= PAGE_MASK;
> > +
> > + if (sizeof(phys_addr_t) < sizeof(u64)) {
> > + if (base > ULONG_MAX) {
> > + pr_warning("Ignoring memory block 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
> > + base, base + size);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (base + size > ULONG_MAX) {
> > + pr_warning("Ignoring memory range 0x%lx - 0x%llx\n",
> > + ULONG_MAX, base + size);
> > + size = ULONG_MAX - base;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > if (base + size < phys_offset) {
> > pr_warning("Ignoring memory block 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
> > base, base + size);
> > --
> > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> > hosted by The Linux Foundation
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-24 11:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-06-20 3:13 [PATCHv2] of: Check for phys_addr_t overflows in early_init_dt_add_memory_arch Laura Abbott
2014-06-20 3:33 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-06-24 11:19 ` Grant Likely
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox