From: geoff@infradead.org (Geoff Levand)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 07/13] arm64: Add new routine local_disable
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:24:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1411604655.6001.176.camel@smoke> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140915185625.GB14191@leverpostej>
Hi Mark,
On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 19:56 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi Geoff,
>
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 11:49:04PM +0100, Geoff Levand wrote:
> > Add the new arm64 routine local_disable() to allow the masking of several DAIF
> > flags in one operation. Currently, we only have routines to mask individual
> > flags, and to mask several flags multiple calls to daifset are required.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
> > index 11cc941..28521d4 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
> > @@ -113,5 +113,18 @@ static inline int arch_irqs_disabled_flags(unsigned long flags)
> > #define local_dbg_enable() asm("msr daifclr, #8" : : : "memory")
> > #define local_dbg_disable() asm("msr daifset, #8" : : : "memory")
> >
> > +enum daif_flag {
>
> Is there any reason for this to be an enum rather than a set of
> #defines?
>
> It would be nice to be able to use these in asm.
>
> > + DAIF_FIQ = (1UL << 6),
> > + DAIF_IRQ = (1UL << 7),
> > + DAIF_ASYNC = (1UL << 8),
> > + DAIF_DBG = (1UL << 9),
> > + DAIF_ALL = (0xffUL << 6),
>
> Not 0xf?
>
> It would be nicer to OR the other flags.
>
> > +};
> > +
> > +static inline void local_disable(unsigned long daif_flags)
> > +{
> > + arch_local_irq_restore(daif_flags | arch_local_save_flags());
>
> If we knew the value was a constant (which we could check with
> __builting_constant_p) we could use daifset here, rather than having a
> RMW sequence.
>
> With that, the other local_*_{enable,disable} calls could be rewritten
> in terms of this, without affecting the generated code. That would
> require some shifting to account for the difference between pstate and
> daif{clr,set} layout, but for constants that shouldn't be a problem.
Since kexec just needs to mask all the DAIF exceptions before the main
CPU is reset I'll just do that inline, and put this rework of the
exception mask routines on my todo list.
-Geoff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-25 0:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-09 22:51 [PATCH 00/13] arm64 kexec kernel patches V2 Geoff Levand
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 04/13] arm64: Add new hcall HVC_CALL_FUNC Geoff Levand
2014-09-10 17:07 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-10 17:23 ` Geoff Levand
2014-09-10 17:35 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-10 18:11 ` [PATCH V2 " Geoff Levand
2014-09-15 18:11 ` [PATCH " Mark Rutland
2014-09-25 0:24 ` Geoff Levand
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 03/13] arm64: Convert hcalls to use ISS field Geoff Levand
2014-09-11 16:14 ` Arun Chandran
2014-09-15 17:57 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-22 21:46 ` Geoff Levand
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 05/13] arm64: Add EL2 switch to soft_restart Geoff Levand
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 06/13] arm64: Add new routine read_cpu_properties Geoff Levand
2014-09-15 18:42 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-25 0:23 ` Geoff Levand
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 01/13] arm64: Add ESR_EL2_EC macros to hyp-stub Geoff Levand
2014-09-15 16:10 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-22 21:45 ` Geoff Levand
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 02/13] arm64/kvm: Fix assembler compatibility of macros Geoff Levand
2014-09-10 8:40 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-09-10 16:35 ` Geoff Levand
2014-09-10 17:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-09-15 16:14 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-10 18:04 ` [PATCH V2 " Geoff Levand
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 07/13] arm64: Add new routine local_disable Geoff Levand
2014-09-15 18:56 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-25 0:24 ` Geoff Levand [this message]
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 11/13] arm64/kexec: Add core kexec support Geoff Levand
2014-09-18 1:13 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-25 0:25 ` Geoff Levand
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 08/13] arm64: Use cpu_ops for smp_stop Geoff Levand
2014-09-15 19:06 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-25 0:24 ` Geoff Levand
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 09/13] arm64/kexec: Kexec expects cpu_die Geoff Levand
2014-09-15 19:10 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 13/13] arm64/kexec: Add kexec_ignore_compat_check param Geoff Levand
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 12/13] arm64/kexec: Enable kexec in the arm64 defconfig Geoff Levand
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 10/13] arm64/kexec: Revert change to machine_shutdown() Geoff Levand
2014-09-15 19:20 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1411604655.6001.176.camel@smoke \
--to=geoff@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox