From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 04/13] arm64: Add new hcall HVC_CALL_FUNC
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:11:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140915181101.GE13789@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ea28cfef061d06e86704845a877802e057749b39.1410302383.git.geoff@infradead.org>
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 11:49:04PM +0100, Geoff Levand wrote:
> Add the new hcall HVC_CALL_FUNC that allows execution of a function at EL2.
> During CPU reset the CPU must be brought to the exception level it had on
> entry to the kernel. The HVC_CALL_FUNC hcall will provide the mechanism
> needed for this exception level switch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h | 11 +++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
> index 894fe53..b217fbc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,17 @@
>
> #define HVC_KVM_CALL_HYP 3
>
> +/*
> + * HVC_CALL_FUNC - Execute a function at EL2.
> + *
> + * @x0: Physical address of the funtion to be executed.
> + * @x1: Passed as the first argument to @fn.
> + * @x2: Passed as the second argument to @fn.
> + * @x3: Passed as the third argument to @fn.
> + */
> +
> +#define HVC_CALL_FUNC 4
> +
Can't we use the HVC_KVM_CALL_HYP for this as well? I thought we already
added the code to the stub to do that in the last patch.
Is there a difference between the two that I'm missing?
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S
> index 9ab5f70..a21cf51 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S
> @@ -75,7 +75,17 @@ el1_sync:
> 1: cmp x10, #HVC_SET_VECTORS
> b.ne 1f
> msr vbar_el2, x0
> + b 2f
>
> +1: cmp x10, #HVC_CALL_FUNC
> + b.ne 1f
> + mov x29, lr
What's the contract for functions we call through the stub?
If they can use all the caller-saved registers, then we need to stach
the original LR before issuing the HVC. Otherwise we can stash it in
x18 at EL2.
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-15 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-09 22:51 [PATCH 00/13] arm64 kexec kernel patches V2 Geoff Levand
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 04/13] arm64: Add new hcall HVC_CALL_FUNC Geoff Levand
2014-09-10 17:07 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-10 17:23 ` Geoff Levand
2014-09-10 17:35 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-10 18:11 ` [PATCH V2 " Geoff Levand
2014-09-15 18:11 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2014-09-25 0:24 ` [PATCH " Geoff Levand
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 07/13] arm64: Add new routine local_disable Geoff Levand
2014-09-15 18:56 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-25 0:24 ` Geoff Levand
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 05/13] arm64: Add EL2 switch to soft_restart Geoff Levand
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 03/13] arm64: Convert hcalls to use ISS field Geoff Levand
2014-09-11 16:14 ` Arun Chandran
2014-09-15 17:57 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-22 21:46 ` Geoff Levand
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 01/13] arm64: Add ESR_EL2_EC macros to hyp-stub Geoff Levand
2014-09-15 16:10 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-22 21:45 ` Geoff Levand
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 02/13] arm64/kvm: Fix assembler compatibility of macros Geoff Levand
2014-09-10 8:40 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-09-10 16:35 ` Geoff Levand
2014-09-10 17:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-09-15 16:14 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-10 18:04 ` [PATCH V2 " Geoff Levand
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 06/13] arm64: Add new routine read_cpu_properties Geoff Levand
2014-09-15 18:42 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-25 0:23 ` Geoff Levand
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 10/13] arm64/kexec: Revert change to machine_shutdown() Geoff Levand
2014-09-15 19:20 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 08/13] arm64: Use cpu_ops for smp_stop Geoff Levand
2014-09-15 19:06 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-25 0:24 ` Geoff Levand
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 09/13] arm64/kexec: Kexec expects cpu_die Geoff Levand
2014-09-15 19:10 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 12/13] arm64/kexec: Enable kexec in the arm64 defconfig Geoff Levand
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 11/13] arm64/kexec: Add core kexec support Geoff Levand
2014-09-18 1:13 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-25 0:25 ` Geoff Levand
2014-09-09 22:49 ` [PATCH 13/13] arm64/kexec: Add kexec_ignore_compat_check param Geoff Levand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140915181101.GE13789@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox