[PATCH] ARM: imx6: fix static declaration in include/soc/imx/cpuidle.h

[PATCH] ARM: imx6: fix static declaration in include/soc/imx/cpuidle.h

[Ben Dooks]

If both CONFIG_CPU_IDLE or CONFIG_SOC_IMX6Q are not set
then the imx6q_cpuidle_fec_irqs_used() and other functions
should be marked static inline to avoid the following
warnings whilst building drivers/net/ethernet/freescale:

include/soc/imx/cpuidle.h:21:6: warning: symbol 'imx6q_cpuidle_fec_irqs_used' was not declared. Should it be static?
include/soc/imx/cpuidle.h:22:6: warning: symbol 'imx6q_cpuidle_fec_irqs_unused' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
---
Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
---
 include/soc/imx/cpuidle.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/soc/imx/cpuidle.h b/include/soc/imx/cpuidle.h
index 986a482..8d393cd 100644
--- a/include/soc/imx/cpuidle.h
+++ b/include/soc/imx/cpuidle.h
@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@
 void imx6q_cpuidle_fec_irqs_used(void);
 void imx6q_cpuidle_fec_irqs_unused(void);
 #else
-void imx6q_cpuidle_fec_irqs_used(void) { }
-void imx6q_cpuidle_fec_irqs_unused(void) { }
+static void imx6q_cpuidle_fec_irqs_used(void) { }
+static void imx6q_cpuidle_fec_irqs_unused(void) { }
 #endif
 
 #endif /* __SOC_IMX_CPUIDLE_H__ */
-- 
2.8.1

[PATCH] ARM: imx6: fix static declaration in include/soc/imx/cpuidle.h

[Ben Dooks]

On 17/06/16 15:47, Ben Dooks wrote:
> If both CONFIG_CPU_IDLE or CONFIG_SOC_IMX6Q are not set
> then the imx6q_cpuidle_fec_irqs_used() and other functions
> should be marked static inline to avoid the following
> warnings whilst building drivers/net/ethernet/freescale:
> 
> include/soc/imx/cpuidle.h:21:6: warning: symbol 'imx6q_cpuidle_fec_irqs_used' was not declared. Should it be static?
> include/soc/imx/cpuidle.h:22:6: warning: symbol 'imx6q_cpuidle_fec_irqs_unused' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>

Apologies, failed to properly merge the inline fix in.
Resend as V2.

-- 
Ben Dooks				http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer				Codethink - Providing Genius