From: julien.thierry@arm.com (Julien Thierry)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/6] arm64: Add support for pseudo-NMIs
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 11:54:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1516190084-18978-7-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1516190084-18978-1-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com>
arm64 does not provide native NMIs. Emulate the NMI behaviour using GIC
priorities.
Add the possibility to set an IRQ as an NMI and the handling of the NMI.
If the view of GIC priorities is the secure one (i.e. SCR_EL3.FIQ == 0), do
not allow the use of NMIs. Emit a warning when attempting to set an IRQ as
NMI under this scenario.
Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 56 +++++++++++++++++
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 141 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/interrupt.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 198 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
index 8209b45..170215c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
@@ -355,6 +355,18 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
mov sp, x19
.endm
+#ifdef CONFIG_USE_ICC_SYSREGS_FOR_IRQFLAGS
+ /* Should be checked on return from irq handlers */
+ .macro branch_if_was_nmi, tmp, target
+ alternative_if ARM64_HAS_SYSREG_GIC_CPUIF
+ mrs \tmp, daif
+ alternative_else
+ mov \tmp, #0
+ alternative_endif
+ tbnz \tmp, #7, \target // Exiting an NMI
+ .endm
+#endif
+
/*
* These are the registers used in the syscall handler, and allow us to
* have in theory up to 7 arguments to a function - x0 to x6.
@@ -574,12 +586,30 @@ ENDPROC(el1_sync)
el1_irq:
kernel_entry 1
enable_da_f
+
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
+#ifdef CONFIG_USE_ICC_SYSREGS_FOR_IRQFLAGS
+ ldr x20, [sp, #S_PMR_SAVE]
+ /* Irqs were disabled, don't trace */
+ tbz x20, ICC_PMR_EL1_EN_SHIFT, 1f
+#endif
bl trace_hardirqs_off
+1:
#endif
irq_handler
+#ifdef CONFIG_USE_ICC_SYSREGS_FOR_IRQFLAGS
+ /*
+ * Irqs were disabled, we have an nmi.
+ * We might have interrupted a context with interrupt disabled that set
+ * NEED_RESCHED flag.
+ * Skip preemption and irq tracing if needed.
+ */
+ tbz x20, ICC_PMR_EL1_EN_SHIFT, untraced_irq_exit
+ branch_if_was_nmi x0, skip_preempt
+#endif
+
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
ldr w24, [tsk, #TSK_TI_PREEMPT] // get preempt count
cbnz w24, 1f // preempt count != 0
@@ -588,9 +618,13 @@ el1_irq:
bl el1_preempt
1:
#endif
+
+skip_preempt:
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
bl trace_hardirqs_on
#endif
+
+untraced_irq_exit:
kernel_exit 1
ENDPROC(el1_irq)
@@ -810,6 +844,11 @@ el0_irq_naked:
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
bl trace_hardirqs_on
#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_USE_ICC_SYSREGS_FOR_IRQFLAGS
+ branch_if_was_nmi x2, nmi_ret_to_user
+#endif
+
b ret_to_user
ENDPROC(el0_irq)
@@ -1000,8 +1039,15 @@ ENTRY(cpu_switch_to)
ldp x27, x28, [x8], #16
ldp x29, x9, [x8], #16
ldr lr, [x8]
+#ifdef CONFIG_USE_ICC_SYSREGS_FOR_IRQFLAGS
+ mrs x10, daif
+ msr daifset, #2
+#endif
mov sp, x9
msr sp_el0, x1
+#ifdef CONFIG_USE_ICC_SYSREGS_FOR_IRQFLAGS
+ msr daif, x10
+#endif
ret
ENDPROC(cpu_switch_to)
NOKPROBE(cpu_switch_to)
@@ -1018,3 +1064,13 @@ ENTRY(ret_from_fork)
b ret_to_user
ENDPROC(ret_from_fork)
NOKPROBE(ret_from_fork)
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_USE_ICC_SYSREGS_FOR_IRQFLAGS
+/*
+ * NMI return path to EL0
+ */
+nmi_ret_to_user:
+ ldr x1, [tsk, #TSK_TI_FLAGS]
+ b finish_ret_to_user
+ENDPROC(nmi_ret_to_user)
+#endif
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index 58b5e89..8d348f9 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h>
#include <linux/irqchip/irq-partition-percpu.h>
+#include <trace/events/irq.h>
+
#include <asm/cputype.h>
#include <asm/exception.h>
#include <asm/smp_plat.h>
@@ -41,6 +43,8 @@
#include "irq-gic-common.h"
+#define GICD_INT_NMI_PRI 0xa0
+
struct redist_region {
void __iomem *redist_base;
phys_addr_t phys_base;
@@ -227,6 +231,87 @@ static void gic_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
gic_poke_irq(d, GICD_ISENABLER);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_USE_ICC_SYSREGS_FOR_IRQFLAGS
+/*
+ * Chip flow handler for SPIs set as NMI
+ */
+static void handle_fasteoi_nmi(struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+ struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
+ struct irqaction *action = desc->action;
+ unsigned int irq = irq_desc_get_irq(desc);
+ irqreturn_t res;
+
+ if (chip->irq_ack)
+ chip->irq_ack(&desc->irq_data);
+
+ trace_irq_handler_entry(irq, action);
+ res = action->handler(irq, action->dev_id);
+ trace_irq_handler_exit(irq, action, res);
+
+ if (chip->irq_eoi)
+ chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Chip flow handler for PPIs set as NMI
+ */
+static void handle_percpu_devid_nmi(struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+ struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
+ struct irqaction *action = desc->action;
+ unsigned int irq = irq_desc_get_irq(desc);
+ irqreturn_t res;
+
+ if (chip->irq_ack)
+ chip->irq_ack(&desc->irq_data);
+
+ trace_irq_handler_entry(irq, action);
+ res = action->handler(irq, raw_cpu_ptr(action->percpu_dev_id));
+ trace_irq_handler_exit(irq, action, res);
+
+ if (chip->irq_eoi)
+ chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
+}
+
+static int gic_irq_set_irqchip_prio(struct irq_data *d, bool val)
+{
+ u8 prio;
+ irq_flow_handler_t handler;
+
+ if (gic_peek_irq(d, GICD_ISENABLER)) {
+ pr_err("Cannot set NMI property of enabled IRQ %u\n", d->irq);
+ return -EPERM;
+ }
+
+ if (val) {
+ prio = GICD_INT_NMI_PRI;
+
+ if (gic_irq(d) < 32)
+ handler = handle_percpu_devid_nmi;
+ else
+ handler = handle_fasteoi_nmi;
+ } else {
+ prio = GICD_INT_DEF_PRI;
+
+ if (gic_irq(d) < 32)
+ handler = handle_percpu_devid_irq;
+ else
+ handler = handle_fasteoi_irq;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Already in a locked context for the desc from calling
+ * irq_set_irq_chip_state.
+ * It should be safe to simply modify the handler.
+ */
+ irq_to_desc(d->irq)->handle_irq = handler;
+ gic_set_irq_prio(gic_irq(d), gic_dist_base(d), prio);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
static int gic_irq_set_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
enum irqchip_irq_state which, bool val)
{
@@ -248,6 +333,18 @@ static int gic_irq_set_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
reg = val ? GICD_ICENABLER : GICD_ISENABLER;
break;
+#ifdef CONFIG_USE_ICC_SYSREGS_FOR_IRQFLAGS
+ case IRQCHIP_STATE_NMI:
+ if (static_branch_likely(&have_non_secure_prio_view)) {
+ return gic_irq_set_irqchip_prio(d, val);
+ } else if (val) {
+ pr_warn("Failed to set IRQ %u as NMI, NMIs are unsupported\n",
+ gic_irq(d));
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ return 0;
+#endif
+
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -275,6 +372,13 @@ static int gic_irq_get_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
*val = !gic_peek_irq(d, GICD_ISENABLER);
break;
+#ifdef CONFIG_USE_ICC_SYSREGS_FOR_IRQFLAGS
+ case IRQCHIP_STATE_NMI:
+ *val = (gic_get_irq_prio(gic_irq(d), gic_dist_base(d)) ==
+ GICD_INT_NMI_PRI);
+ break;
+#endif
+
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -345,6 +449,22 @@ static u64 gic_mpidr_to_affinity(unsigned long mpidr)
return aff;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_USE_ICC_SYSREGS_FOR_IRQFLAGS
+static void do_handle_nmi(unsigned int hwirq, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ struct pt_regs *old_regs = set_irq_regs(regs);
+ unsigned int irq;
+
+ nmi_enter();
+
+ irq = irq_find_mapping(gic_data.domain, hwirq);
+ generic_handle_irq(irq);
+
+ nmi_exit();
+ set_irq_regs(old_regs);
+}
+#endif
+
static asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry gic_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
u32 irqnr;
@@ -360,6 +480,25 @@ static asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry gic_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs
if (likely(irqnr > 15 && irqnr < 1020) || irqnr >= 8192) {
int err;
+#ifdef CONFIG_USE_ICC_SYSREGS_FOR_IRQFLAGS
+ if (static_branch_likely(&have_non_secure_prio_view)
+ && unlikely(gic_read_rpr() == GICD_INT_NMI_PRI)) {
+ /*
+ * We need to prevent other NMIs to occur even after a
+ * priority drop.
+ * We keep I flag set until cpsr is restored from
+ * kernel_exit.
+ */
+ arch_irqs_daif_disable();
+
+ if (static_key_true(&supports_deactivate))
+ gic_write_eoir(irqnr);
+
+ do_handle_nmi(irqnr, regs);
+ return;
+ }
+#endif
+
if (static_key_true(&supports_deactivate))
gic_write_eoir(irqnr);
else {
@@ -1057,6 +1196,8 @@ static void __init gic_detect_prio_view(void)
if (gic_read_rpr() == gic_get_irq_prio(acked_irqnr,
rdist_base))
static_branch_enable(&have_non_secure_prio_view);
+ else
+ pr_warn("Cannot enable use of pseudo-NMIs\n");
} else {
pr_warn("Unexpected IRQ for priority detection: %u\n",
acked_irqnr);
diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h
index 69c2382..cdcefe4 100644
--- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
+++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
@@ -421,6 +421,7 @@ enum irqchip_irq_state {
IRQCHIP_STATE_ACTIVE, /* Is interrupt in progress? */
IRQCHIP_STATE_MASKED, /* Is interrupt masked? */
IRQCHIP_STATE_LINE_LEVEL, /* Is IRQ line high? */
+ IRQCHIP_STATE_NMI, /* Is IRQ an NMI? */
};
extern int irq_get_irqchip_state(unsigned int irq, enum irqchip_irq_state which,
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-17 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-17 11:54 [PATCH v2 0/6] arm64: provide pseudo NMI with GICv3 Julien Thierry
2018-01-17 11:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] arm64: cpufeature: Allow early detect of specific features Julien Thierry
2018-01-22 12:05 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-22 12:21 ` Julien Thierry
2018-01-22 13:38 ` Daniel Thompson
2018-01-22 13:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-01-22 14:14 ` Julien Thierry
2018-01-22 14:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-01-22 14:45 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-22 15:01 ` Julien Thierry
2018-01-22 15:13 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-22 15:23 ` Julien Thierry
2018-01-22 15:34 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-17 11:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] arm64: alternative: Apply alternatives early in boot process Julien Thierry
2018-05-04 10:06 ` Julien Thierry
2018-05-09 14:27 ` Daniel Thompson
2018-05-09 21:52 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-05-11 8:12 ` Julien Thierry
2018-05-11 9:19 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-17 11:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] arm64: irqflags: Use ICC sysregs to implement IRQ masking Julien Thierry
2018-01-17 11:54 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] irqchip/gic: Add functions to access irq priorities Julien Thierry
2018-01-17 11:54 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: Detect current view of GIC priorities Julien Thierry
2018-02-03 3:01 ` Yang Yingliang
2018-01-17 11:54 ` Julien Thierry [this message]
2018-01-17 12:10 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] arm64: provide pseudo NMI with GICv3 Julien Thierry
2018-04-29 6:37 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-04-30 9:53 ` Julien Thierry
2018-04-30 10:55 ` Daniel Thompson
2018-05-01 18:18 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-02 11:02 ` Daniel Thompson
[not found] ` <8315db11-7899-008d-f37a-c311b278a1c4@hisilicon.com>
[not found] ` <7ec201a4-e2dc-8a1e-e8a1-f2b10bd41cd4@huawei.com>
[not found] ` <afb46ee0-4f26-fd1a-2fd1-866dc0b25175@arm.com>
2018-03-27 12:48 ` dongbo (E)
2018-03-27 13:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-03-27 13:09 ` Julien Thierry
2018-04-29 6:35 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-04-30 9:46 ` Julien Thierry
2018-05-01 20:51 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-02 11:08 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1516190084-18978-7-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com \
--to=julien.thierry@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox