From: julien.thierry@arm.com (Julien Thierry)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/6] arm64: cpufeature: Allow early detect of specific features
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:01:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5cafee50-c2ee-6c04-756c-785cdf822b27@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2fa17395-d268-5ec9-6033-08ecb7eba44a@arm.com>
On 22/01/18 14:45, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 22/01/18 12:21, Julien Thierry wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 22/01/18 12:05, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>>> On 17/01/18 11:54, Julien Thierry wrote:
>>>> From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
>>>>
>>>> Currently it is not possible to detect features of the boot CPU
>>>> until the other CPUs have been brought up.
>>>>
>>>> This prevents us from reacting to features of the boot CPU until
>>>> fairly late in the boot process. To solve this we allow a subset
>>>> of features (that are likely to be common to all clusters) to be
>>>> detected based on the boot CPU alone.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
>>>> [julien.thierry at arm.com: check non-boot cpu missing early features,
>>>> avoid
>>>> duplicates between early features and normal
>>>> features]
>>>> Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
>>>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>>>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>>>> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 69
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>>>> b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>>>> index a73a592..6698404 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>>>> @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@
>>>> DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_hwcaps, ARM64_NCAPS);
>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_hwcaps);
>>>>
>>>> +static void __init setup_early_feature_capabilities(void);
>>>> +
>>>> /*
>>>> * Flag to indicate if we have computed the system wide
>>>> * capabilities based on the boot time active CPUs. This
>>>> @@ -542,6 +544,8 @@ void __init init_cpu_features(struct
>>>> cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
>>>> init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ZCR_EL1, info->reg_zcr);
>>>> sve_init_vq_map();
>>>> }
>>>> +
>>>> + setup_early_feature_capabilities();
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static void update_cpu_ftr_reg(struct arm64_ftr_reg *reg, u64 new)
>>>> @@ -846,7 +850,7 @@ static bool has_no_fpsimd(const struct
>>>> arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, int __unus
>>>> ID_AA64PFR0_FP_SHIFT) < 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = {
>>>> +static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_early_features[] = {
>>>> {
>>>> .desc = "GIC system register CPU interface",
>>>> .capability = ARM64_HAS_SYSREG_GIC_CPUIF,
>>>> @@ -857,6 +861,10 @@ static bool has_no_fpsimd(const struct
>>>> arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, int __unus
>>>> .sign = FTR_UNSIGNED,
>>>> .min_field_value = 1,
>>>> },
>>>> + {}
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>
>>>
>>> Julien,
>>>
>>> One potential problem with this is that we don't have a way
>>> to make this work on a "theoretical" system with and without
>>> GIC system reg interface. i.e, if we don't have the CONFIG
>>> enabled for using ICC system regs for IRQ flags, the kernel
>>> could still panic. I understand this is not a "normal" configuration
>>> but, may be we could make the panic option based on whether
>>> we actually use the system regs early enough ?
>>>
>>
>> I see, however I'm not sure what happens in the GIC drivers if we have
>> a CPU running with a GICv3 and other CPUs with something else... But
>> of course this is not technically limited by the arm64 capabilities
>> handling.
>>
>> What behaviour would you be looking for? A way to prevent the CPU to
>> be brought up instead of panicking?
>>
>
> If we have the CONFIG enabled for using system regs, we can continue
> to panic the system. Otherwise, we should ignore the mismatch early,
> as we don't use the system register access unless all boot time active
> CPUs have it.
>
Hmmm, we use the CPUIF (if available) in the first CPU pretty much as
soon as we re-enable interrupts in the GICv3 driver, which is way before
the other CPUs are brought up.
other CPUs get to die_early().
> In a nutshell, this is an early feature only if the CONFIG is enabled,
> otherwise should fall back to the normal behavior.
>
Maybe we should just not panic and let the mismatching CPUs die.
It's a system wide feature and linux will try to make the other CPUs
match the boot CPU's config anyway.
--
Julien Thierry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-22 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-17 11:54 [PATCH v2 0/6] arm64: provide pseudo NMI with GICv3 Julien Thierry
2018-01-17 11:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] arm64: cpufeature: Allow early detect of specific features Julien Thierry
2018-01-22 12:05 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-22 12:21 ` Julien Thierry
2018-01-22 13:38 ` Daniel Thompson
2018-01-22 13:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-01-22 14:14 ` Julien Thierry
2018-01-22 14:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-01-22 14:45 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-22 15:01 ` Julien Thierry [this message]
2018-01-22 15:13 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-22 15:23 ` Julien Thierry
2018-01-22 15:34 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-17 11:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] arm64: alternative: Apply alternatives early in boot process Julien Thierry
2018-05-04 10:06 ` Julien Thierry
2018-05-09 14:27 ` Daniel Thompson
2018-05-09 21:52 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-05-11 8:12 ` Julien Thierry
2018-05-11 9:19 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-17 11:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] arm64: irqflags: Use ICC sysregs to implement IRQ masking Julien Thierry
2018-01-17 11:54 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] irqchip/gic: Add functions to access irq priorities Julien Thierry
2018-01-17 11:54 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: Detect current view of GIC priorities Julien Thierry
2018-02-03 3:01 ` Yang Yingliang
2018-01-17 11:54 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] arm64: Add support for pseudo-NMIs Julien Thierry
2018-01-17 12:10 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] arm64: provide pseudo NMI with GICv3 Julien Thierry
2018-04-29 6:37 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-04-30 9:53 ` Julien Thierry
2018-04-30 10:55 ` Daniel Thompson
2018-05-01 18:18 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-02 11:02 ` Daniel Thompson
[not found] ` <8315db11-7899-008d-f37a-c311b278a1c4@hisilicon.com>
[not found] ` <7ec201a4-e2dc-8a1e-e8a1-f2b10bd41cd4@huawei.com>
[not found] ` <afb46ee0-4f26-fd1a-2fd1-866dc0b25175@arm.com>
2018-03-27 12:48 ` dongbo (E)
2018-03-27 13:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-03-27 13:09 ` Julien Thierry
2018-04-29 6:35 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-04-30 9:46 ` Julien Thierry
2018-05-01 20:51 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-02 11:08 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5cafee50-c2ee-6c04-756c-785cdf822b27@arm.com \
--to=julien.thierry@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox