* [PATCH v2] sched/clock: Prevent generic sched_clock wrap caused by tick_freeze()
@ 2019-03-29 2:59 Chang-An Chen
2019-04-15 5:44 ` Chang-An Chen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chang-An Chen @ 2019-03-29 2:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frederic Weisbecker, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
Matthias Brugger
Cc: Corey Minyard, freddy.hsin, Chang-An Chen, Kees Cook,
kuohong.wang, linux-kernel, linux-mediatek, John Stultz,
Stanley Chu, linux-arm-kernel
tick_freeze() introduced by suspend-to-idle in commit 124cf9117c5f
("PM / sleep: Make it possible to quiesce timers during suspend-to-idle")
will use timekeeping_suspend() instead of syscore_suspend() during
suspend-to-idle. It means that generic sched_clock will keep going because
sched_clock_suspend() and sched_clock_resume() are not taken during
suspend-to-idle. This will lead to generic sched_clock wrap.
For example:
In my arm system with suspend-to-idle enabled, sched_clock is registered
as "56 bits at 13MHz, resolution 76ns, wraps every 4398046511101ns", which
means the real wrapping duration is 8796093022202ns.
[ 134.551779] suspend-to-idle suspend (timekeeping_suspend())
[ 1204.912239] suspend-to-idle resume (timekeeping_resume())
......
[ 1206.912239] suspend-to-idle suspend (timekeeping_suspend())
[ 5880.502807] suspend-to-idle resume (timekeeping_resume())
......
[ 6000.403724] suspend-to-idle suspend (timekeeping_suspend())
[ 8035.753167] suspend-to-idle resume (timekeeping_resume())
......
[ 8795.786684] (2)[321:charger_thread]......
[ 8795.788387] (2)[321:charger_thread]......
[ 0.057226] (0)[0:swapper/0]......
[ 0.061447] (2)[0:swapper/2]......
Sched_clock was not stopped during suspend-to-idle, and sched_clock_poll
hrtimer was not expired because timekeeping_suspend() is taken during
suspend-to-idle. It makes sched_clock wrap at kernel time 8796s.
To fix this issue, we add sched_clock_suspend() and sched_clock_resume() in
tick_freeze() together with timekeeping_suspend() and timekeeping_resume()
to make sure generic sched_clock wrapping will not happen.
Signed-off-by: Chang-An Chen <chang-an.chen@mediatek.com>
Fixes: 124cf9117c5f (PM / sleep: Make it possible to quiesce timers during suspend-to-idle)
---
kernel/time/sched_clock.c | 4 ++--
kernel/time/tick-common.c | 2 ++
kernel/time/timekeeping.h | 7 +++++++
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/sched_clock.c b/kernel/time/sched_clock.c
index 094b82c..930113b 100644
--- a/kernel/time/sched_clock.c
+++ b/kernel/time/sched_clock.c
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static u64 notrace suspended_sched_clock_read(void)
return cd.read_data[seq & 1].epoch_cyc;
}
-static int sched_clock_suspend(void)
+int sched_clock_suspend(void)
{
struct clock_read_data *rd = &cd.read_data[0];
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static int sched_clock_suspend(void)
return 0;
}
-static void sched_clock_resume(void)
+void sched_clock_resume(void)
{
struct clock_read_data *rd = &cd.read_data[0];
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
index 529143b..df40146 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
@@ -487,6 +487,7 @@ void tick_freeze(void)
trace_suspend_resume(TPS("timekeeping_freeze"),
smp_processor_id(), true);
system_state = SYSTEM_SUSPEND;
+ sched_clock_suspend();
timekeeping_suspend();
} else {
tick_suspend_local();
@@ -510,6 +511,7 @@ void tick_unfreeze(void)
if (tick_freeze_depth == num_online_cpus()) {
timekeeping_resume();
+ sched_clock_resume();
system_state = SYSTEM_RUNNING;
trace_suspend_resume(TPS("timekeeping_freeze"),
smp_processor_id(), false);
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.h b/kernel/time/timekeeping.h
index 7a9b4eb..141ab3a 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.h
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.h
@@ -14,6 +14,13 @@ extern ktime_t ktime_get_update_offsets_now(unsigned int *cwsseq,
extern void timekeeping_warp_clock(void);
extern int timekeeping_suspend(void);
extern void timekeeping_resume(void);
+#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK
+extern int sched_clock_suspend(void);
+extern void sched_clock_resume(void);
+#else
+static inline int sched_clock_suspend(void) { return 0; }
+static inline void sched_clock_resume(void) { }
+#endif
extern void do_timer(unsigned long ticks);
extern void update_wall_time(void);
--
1.7.9.5
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] sched/clock: Prevent generic sched_clock wrap caused by tick_freeze()
2019-03-29 2:59 [PATCH v2] sched/clock: Prevent generic sched_clock wrap caused by tick_freeze() Chang-An Chen
@ 2019-04-15 5:44 ` Chang-An Chen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chang-An Chen @ 2019-04-15 5:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frederic Weisbecker, Matthias Brugger, Ingo Molnar,
Thomas Gleixner
Cc: Corey Minyard, Freddy Hsin (辛恒豐), Kees Cook,
Kuohong Wang (王國鴻),
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
John Stultz, Stanley Chu (朱原陞),
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Hi,
This is just a gentle ping for this patch.
On Fri, 2019-03-29 at 10:59 +0800, Chang-An Chen wrote:
> tick_freeze() introduced by suspend-to-idle in commit 124cf9117c5f
> ("PM / sleep: Make it possible to quiesce timers during suspend-to-idle")
> will use timekeeping_suspend() instead of syscore_suspend() during
> suspend-to-idle. It means that generic sched_clock will keep going because
> sched_clock_suspend() and sched_clock_resume() are not taken during
> suspend-to-idle. This will lead to generic sched_clock wrap.
>
> For example:
> In my arm system with suspend-to-idle enabled, sched_clock is registered
> as "56 bits at 13MHz, resolution 76ns, wraps every 4398046511101ns", which
> means the real wrapping duration is 8796093022202ns.
>
> [ 134.551779] suspend-to-idle suspend (timekeeping_suspend())
> [ 1204.912239] suspend-to-idle resume (timekeeping_resume())
> ......
> [ 1206.912239] suspend-to-idle suspend (timekeeping_suspend())
> [ 5880.502807] suspend-to-idle resume (timekeeping_resume())
> ......
> [ 6000.403724] suspend-to-idle suspend (timekeeping_suspend())
> [ 8035.753167] suspend-to-idle resume (timekeeping_resume())
> ......
> [ 8795.786684] (2)[321:charger_thread]......
> [ 8795.788387] (2)[321:charger_thread]......
> [ 0.057226] (0)[0:swapper/0]......
> [ 0.061447] (2)[0:swapper/2]......
>
> Sched_clock was not stopped during suspend-to-idle, and sched_clock_poll
> hrtimer was not expired because timekeeping_suspend() is taken during
> suspend-to-idle. It makes sched_clock wrap at kernel time 8796s.
>
> To fix this issue, we add sched_clock_suspend() and sched_clock_resume() in
> tick_freeze() together with timekeeping_suspend() and timekeeping_resume()
> to make sure generic sched_clock wrapping will not happen.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chang-An Chen <chang-an.chen@mediatek.com>
> Fixes: 124cf9117c5f (PM / sleep: Make it possible to quiesce timers during suspend-to-idle)
> ---
> kernel/time/sched_clock.c | 4 ++--
> kernel/time/tick-common.c | 2 ++
> kernel/time/timekeeping.h | 7 +++++++
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/sched_clock.c b/kernel/time/sched_clock.c
> index 094b82c..930113b 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/sched_clock.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/sched_clock.c
> @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static u64 notrace suspended_sched_clock_read(void)
> return cd.read_data[seq & 1].epoch_cyc;
> }
>
> -static int sched_clock_suspend(void)
> +int sched_clock_suspend(void)
> {
> struct clock_read_data *rd = &cd.read_data[0];
>
> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static int sched_clock_suspend(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void sched_clock_resume(void)
> +void sched_clock_resume(void)
> {
> struct clock_read_data *rd = &cd.read_data[0];
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
> index 529143b..df40146 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
> @@ -487,6 +487,7 @@ void tick_freeze(void)
> trace_suspend_resume(TPS("timekeeping_freeze"),
> smp_processor_id(), true);
> system_state = SYSTEM_SUSPEND;
> + sched_clock_suspend();
> timekeeping_suspend();
> } else {
> tick_suspend_local();
> @@ -510,6 +511,7 @@ void tick_unfreeze(void)
>
> if (tick_freeze_depth == num_online_cpus()) {
> timekeeping_resume();
> + sched_clock_resume();
> system_state = SYSTEM_RUNNING;
> trace_suspend_resume(TPS("timekeeping_freeze"),
> smp_processor_id(), false);
> diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.h b/kernel/time/timekeeping.h
> index 7a9b4eb..141ab3a 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.h
> +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,13 @@ extern ktime_t ktime_get_update_offsets_now(unsigned int *cwsseq,
> extern void timekeeping_warp_clock(void);
> extern int timekeeping_suspend(void);
> extern void timekeeping_resume(void);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK
> +extern int sched_clock_suspend(void);
> +extern void sched_clock_resume(void);
> +#else
> +static inline int sched_clock_suspend(void) { return 0; }
> +static inline void sched_clock_resume(void) { }
> +#endif
>
> extern void do_timer(unsigned long ticks);
> extern void update_wall_time(void);
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-04-15 5:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-03-29 2:59 [PATCH v2] sched/clock: Prevent generic sched_clock wrap caused by tick_freeze() Chang-An Chen
2019-04-15 5:44 ` Chang-An Chen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox