[Possible PATCH]arm64: ftrace: Change CONFIG_FTRACE_WITH_REGS to CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS

[Possible PATCH]arm64: ftrace: Change CONFIG_FTRACE_WITH_REGS to CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS

[Joe Perches]

CONFIG_FTRACE_WITH_REGS does not exist as a Kconfig symbol.

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
---

I don't have the hardware, so I can't tell if this is a
correct change, but it is a logical one.

Found by a test script that looks for IS_ENABLED(FOO)
where FOO must also exist in Kconfig files.

 arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c
index 8618faa82e6d..86a5cf9bc19a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c
@@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ static struct plt_entry *get_ftrace_plt(struct module *mod, unsigned long addr)
 
 	if (addr == FTRACE_ADDR)
 		return &plt[FTRACE_PLT_IDX];
-	if (addr == FTRACE_REGS_ADDR && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FTRACE_WITH_REGS))
+	if (addr == FTRACE_REGS_ADDR &&
+	    IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS))
 		return &plt[FTRACE_REGS_PLT_IDX];
 #endif
 	return NULL;


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [Possible PATCH]arm64: ftrace: Change CONFIG_FTRACE_WITH_REGS to CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS

[Will Deacon]

On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 12:25:50PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> CONFIG_FTRACE_WITH_REGS does not exist as a Kconfig symbol.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> ---
> 
> I don't have the hardware, so I can't tell if this is a
> correct change, but it is a logical one.
> 
> Found by a test script that looks for IS_ENABLED(FOO)
> where FOO must also exist in Kconfig files.
> 
>  arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c
> index 8618faa82e6d..86a5cf9bc19a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c
> @@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ static struct plt_entry *get_ftrace_plt(struct module *mod, unsigned long addr)
>  
>  	if (addr == FTRACE_ADDR)
>  		return &plt[FTRACE_PLT_IDX];
> -	if (addr == FTRACE_REGS_ADDR && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FTRACE_WITH_REGS))
> +	if (addr == FTRACE_REGS_ADDR &&
> +	    IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS))
>  		return &plt[FTRACE_REGS_PLT_IDX];

Ha! So much for 100-char lines ;)

(fix looks good to me, I'll queue it for -rc1)

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [Possible PATCH]arm64: ftrace: Change CONFIG_FTRACE_WITH_REGS to CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS

[Mark Rutland]

On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 12:25:50PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> CONFIG_FTRACE_WITH_REGS does not exist as a Kconfig symbol.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> ---
> 
> I don't have the hardware, so I can't tell if this is a
> correct change, but it is a logical one.
> 
> Found by a test script that looks for IS_ENABLED(FOO)
> where FOO must also exist in Kconfig files.
> 
>  arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c
> index 8618faa82e6d..86a5cf9bc19a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c
> @@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ static struct plt_entry *get_ftrace_plt(struct module *mod, unsigned long addr)
>  
>  	if (addr == FTRACE_ADDR)
>  		return &plt[FTRACE_PLT_IDX];
> -	if (addr == FTRACE_REGS_ADDR && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FTRACE_WITH_REGS))
> +	if (addr == FTRACE_REGS_ADDR &&
> +	    IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS))
>  		return &plt[FTRACE_REGS_PLT_IDX];

This was my bad; I broke this among some cleanup, and evidently I did
not test that as well as I thought I had.

This should be backported, so we should add:

Fixes: 3b23e4991fb66f6d ("arm64: implement ftrace with regs")

Looks good to me, so:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Thanks,
Mark.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [Possible PATCH]arm64: ftrace: Change CONFIG_FTRACE_WITH_REGS to CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS

[Will Deacon]

On Sat, 06 Jun 2020 12:25:50 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> CONFIG_FTRACE_WITH_REGS does not exist as a Kconfig symbol.

Applied to arm64 (for-next/core), thanks!

[1/1] arm64: ftrace: Change CONFIG_FTRACE_WITH_REGS to CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/91970bef48d6

Cheers,
-- 
Will

https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel