Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
	maz@kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] arm_pmu: Introduce pmu_irq_ops
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:23:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <159242539231.62212.11549121838391298623@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200617113851.607706-7-alexandru.elisei@arm.com>

Quoting Alexandru Elisei (2020-06-17 04:38:50)
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> index df352b334ea7..17e5952d21e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> @@ -26,8 +26,46 @@
>  
>  #include <asm/irq_regs.h>
>  
> +static int armpmu_count_irq_users(const int irq);
> +
> +struct pmu_irq_ops {
> +       void (*enable_pmuirq)(unsigned int irq);
> +       void (*disable_pmuirq)(unsigned int irq);
> +       void (*free_pmuirq)(unsigned int irq, int cpu, void __percpu *devid);

Does 'cpu' need to be signed?

> +};
> +
> +static void armpmu_free_pmuirq(unsigned int irq, int cpu, void __percpu *devid)
> +{
> +       free_irq(irq, per_cpu_ptr(devid, cpu));
> +}
> +
> +static const struct pmu_irq_ops pmuirq_ops = {
> +       .enable_pmuirq = enable_irq,
> +       .disable_pmuirq = disable_irq_nosync,
> +       .free_pmuirq = armpmu_free_pmuirq
> +};
> +
> +static void armpmu_enable_percpu_pmuirq(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> +       enable_percpu_irq(irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
> +}
> +
> +static void armpmu_free_percpu_pmuirq(unsigned int irq, int cpu,
> +                                  void __percpu *devid)
> +{
> +       if (armpmu_count_irq_users(irq) == 1)
> +               free_percpu_irq(irq, devid);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct pmu_irq_ops percpu_pmuirq_ops = {
> +       .enable_pmuirq = armpmu_enable_percpu_pmuirq,
> +       .disable_pmuirq = disable_percpu_irq,
> +       .free_pmuirq = armpmu_free_percpu_pmuirq
> +};
> +
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct arm_pmu *, cpu_armpmu);
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, cpu_irq);

Same question as above.

> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(const struct pmu_irq_ops *, cpu_irq_ops);
>  
>  static inline u64 arm_pmu_event_max_period(struct perf_event *event)
>  {

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-17 20:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-17 11:38 [PATCH v5 0/7] arm_pmu: Use NMI for perf interrupt Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-17 11:38 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] arm64: perf: Add missing ISB in armv8pmu_enable_event() Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-17 20:01   ` Stephen Boyd
2020-06-18 10:50     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-17 11:38 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] arm64: perf: Avoid PMXEV* indirection Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-17 20:11   ` Stephen Boyd
2020-06-18 10:51     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-19  8:26       ` Stephen Boyd
2020-06-17 11:38 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] arm64: perf: Remove PMU locking Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-17 20:17   ` Stephen Boyd
2020-06-18 10:51     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-19  8:29       ` Stephen Boyd
2020-07-03 13:45         ` Will Deacon
2020-06-17 11:38 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] arm64: perf: Defer irq_work to IPI_IRQ_WORK Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-17 11:38 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] arm64: kvm: pmu: Make overflow handler NMI safe Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-17 11:38 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] arm_pmu: Introduce pmu_irq_ops Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-17 20:23   ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2020-06-18 10:51     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-19  8:33       ` Stephen Boyd
2020-06-17 11:38 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] arm_pmu: arm64: Use NMIs for PMU Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] arm_pmu: Use NMI for perf interrupt Alexandru Elisei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=159242539231.62212.11549121838391298623@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=swboyd@chromium.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox