From: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@gmx.net>,
Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>,
linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.org>,
detule <ogjoneski@gmail.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
STAGING SUBSYSTEM <linux-staging@lists.linux.dev>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vc04_services: vchiq_arm: Fix initialisation check
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 13:00:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <171836641941.2248009.7362589437453917188@ping.linuxembedded.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <104f23d7-9832-4c06-92c7-d3ea84fbf186@gmx.net>
Quoting Stefan Wahren (2024-06-14 12:52:53)
> Hi Kieran,
>
> Am 14.06.24 um 13:36 schrieb Kieran Bingham:
> > Hi Stefan,
> >
> > Sorry, indeed I completely missed this mail.
> >
> > Quoting Stefan Wahren (2024-06-13 21:01:42)
> >> Hi Kieran,
> >>
> >> Am 13.06.24 um 21:41 schrieb Kieran Bingham:
> >>> The vchiq_state used to be obtained through an accessor
> >>> which would validate that the VCHIQ had been initialised
> >>> correctly with the remote.
> >>>
> >>> In commit 42a2f6664e18 ("staging: vc04_services: Move global g_state to
> >>> vchiq_state") the global state was moved to the vchiq_mgnt structures
> >>> stored as a vchiq instance specific context. This conversion removed the
> >>> helpers and instead replaced users of this helper with the assumption
> >>> that the state is always available and the remote connected.
> >>>
> >>> Fix this broken assumption by re-introducing the logic that was lost
> >>> during the conversion.
> >> thank you for sending this patch. Maybe it's worth to mention that this
> >> patch also drop some unnecessary NULL checks of state.
> > I don't understand this comment. Nothing is dropped is it?
> >
> > The newly added vchiq_remote_initialised() is itself a null-check too!
> the vchiq_remote_initialised() only checks the member remote, but not
> state itself. From my point of view the null-check for state is
> unnecessary, because most of the code already assumed that state is not
> null like e.g. in vchiq_open().
>
aha, I misread my own code ;-) Of course - I see it now.
I'll send v3.
--
Kieran
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-14 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-13 19:41 [PATCH] staging: vc04_services: vchiq_arm: Fix initialisation check Kieran Bingham
2024-06-13 19:41 ` Kieran Bingham
2024-06-13 20:01 ` Stefan Wahren
[not found] ` <171836496531.2248009.11650291484570726735@ping.linuxembedded.co.uk>
2024-06-14 11:52 ` Stefan Wahren
2024-06-14 12:00 ` Kieran Bingham [this message]
2024-06-14 6:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-06-13 19:58 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=171836641941.2248009.7362589437453917188@ping.linuxembedded.co.uk \
--to=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.org \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ogjoneski@gmail.com \
--cc=umang.jain@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=wahrenst@gmx.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox